Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Date

Nov 02, 2015

Attendees

Notes:

  • Discussed the prior week's VRM day 4hour meeting on USTs. 
  • Monday last week was VRM day and our discussions then and today covered: 
    * User terms project scope: we are to make the icons and term definitions (human readable, machine and legal) as a common open standard that then anyone can use
    ** we should document this in the next week, so that we can ask some different orgs for money to hire a designer, do a bit of engineering, some UX
    * Interface issues: how a company presents the interface on their own product or service is something we can advise on, and give examples for but obviously companies are going to do what works for them;  versions of this may include:  
    ** a company could show the icons and make definitions one click away, asking users to choose the icons they want
    ** companies might make it possible for a user to point to another user's selections and just use those
    ** a company might offer a simpler way to choose a lot of privacy control with little data sharing, a medium amount of each, or little privacy with lots of data sharing. NOTE: We should probably advise on this, once our project has an MVP.. based upon our experiences and ideas
    * Process: where do User Terms fit in? We should document and show this in the project webpages in a diagram, so that entities can see how their TOUs and PPs show, the USTs and the "agreement" if there is a check box, and then the consent receipt to knit everything together.

Discussion Items

TimeItemWhoNotes
    

Action Items

  • Mary Hodder: make pages for the project overview, process where USTs fit, CRs fit, etc in the agreement dance, interface page, etc.