[WG-UMA] New issue #110: Consider adding optional location URI property to resource set description

Maciej Machulak maciej.machulak at gmail.com
Fri Oct 31 10:23:18 CDT 2014


OK, I will send something to the list

On 31 October 2014 16:22, Eve Maler <eve at xmlgrrl.com> wrote:

> Thanks for responding so quickly! Would you like to propose some spec text
> in this case, so people can see exactly what the property definition would
> look like, and judge on that basis?
>
> Eve
>
> On 31 Oct 2014, at 8:21 AM, Maciej Machulak <maciej.machulak at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Eve,
>
> Just commented on GitHub. I think adding a location URI is a good idea.
> Cloud Identity already supports that in its UMA implementations and this
> was shown during the demo at IIW.
>
> I am not sure about issues #20 and #31 - I will need to check them first.
>
> Cheers, Maciej
>
> On 31 October 2014 16:19, Eve Maler <eve at xmlgrrl.com> wrote:
>
>> ...possibly enabling us to kill issues #20 and #31 as well.
>>
>> https://github.com/xmlgrrl/UMA-Specifications/issues/110
>>
>> "With a property like this, the RS can inform the AS of not just the
>> abstract properties of a resource set, but a specific property as well: its
>> location, which can help the AS in term inform others that want to know.
>> This could be useful not just for an UMA AS, but also for an OpenID Connect
>> OP in the use case identified in the RSR spec introduction [
>> http://docs.kantarainitiative.org/uma/draft-oauth-resource-reg.html#rfc.section.1],
>> for feeding a distributed claims (or even aggregated claims) mechanism.
>>
>> Nat and I discussed this while at IIW this week. It would be an extremely
>> lightweight way to help solve an important portion of the personal
>> discovery service challenge discussed in issue #20, as well as the resource
>> "baskets" or "bundles" notion discussed in issue #31, because the
>> application hosting the AS could also be an RS with a special "singular"
>> UMA-protected resource set that consists of a set of pointers, OpenID
>> Connect distributed claims-style (
>> http://openid.net/specs/openid-connect-core-1_0.html#DistributedExample),
>> to a variety of other OAuth-protected resource sets (possibly at multiple
>> resource servers)."
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>>         Eve
>>
>> Eve Maler                                  http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
>> +1 425 345 6756                         http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WG-UMA mailing list
>> WG-UMA at kantarainitiative.org
>> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Maciej Machulak
> email: maciej.machulak at gmail.com
> mobile: +44 7999 606 767 (UK)
> mobile: +48 602 45 31 66 (PL)
>
>
>
> Eve Maler                                  http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
> +1 425 345 6756                         http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl
>
>


-- 
Maciej Machulak
email: maciej.machulak at gmail.com
mobile: +44 7999 606 767 (UK)
mobile: +48 602 45 31 66 (PL)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-uma/attachments/20141031/7878627e/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the WG-UMA mailing list