[WG-UMA] For email and Oct 9 discussion/closure: unnecessary status parameter (issue 105)

Maciej Machulak maciej.machulak at gmail.com
Wed Oct 15 19:06:19 CDT 2014


Hi all,

As promised during the call, I think this is an easy issue to resolve
during the call on Thursday. I do not see a reason to have duplicate
information in the response to the client.

Cheers,
Maciej

On 7 October 2014 17:05, Eve Maler <eve at xmlgrrl.com> wrote:

> https://github.com/xmlgrrl/UMA-Specifications/issues/105
>
> Reported by Maciej:
>
> In resource registration spec [1], we use the field "status" to inform the
> RS that a resource set is created on AS. This duplicates information that
> the RS obtains through HTTP return codes. Maybe this field should be
> removed?
>
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hardjono-oauth-resource-reg-03
>
> Eve Maler                                  http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
> +1 425 345 6756                         http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl
>
> _______________________________________________
> WG-UMA mailing list
> WG-UMA at kantarainitiative.org
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma
>



-- 
Maciej Machulak
email: maciej.machulak at gmail.com
mobile: +44 7999 606 767 (UK)
mobile: +48 602 45 31 66 (PL)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-uma/attachments/20141016/94d9e2e3/attachment.html>


More information about the WG-UMA mailing list