[WG-UMA] Unnecessary "status" parameter for resource reg

Eve Maler eve at xmlgrrl.com
Wed Aug 27 09:19:08 CDT 2014


I'll create a new issue for this. Unless anyone wants to disagree, I think this is worth fielding in the run-up to V1.0.

Can anyone think of a reason why the UMA-specific field adds value to the HTTP-level return code?

	Eve

On 26 Aug 2014, at 3:18 PM, Maciej Machulak <maciej.machulak at gmail.com> wrote:

> In resource registration spec [1], we use the field "status" to inform the RS that a resource set is created on AS. This duplicates information that the RS obtains through HTTP return codes. Maybe this field should be removed?
> 
> Cheers, Maciej
> 
> [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hardjono-oauth-resource-reg-03
> 
> -- 
> Maciej Machulak
> email: maciej.machulak at gmail.com
> mobile: +44 7999 606 767 (UK)
> mobile: +48 602 45 31 66 (PL)
> _______________________________________________
> WG-UMA mailing list
> WG-UMA at kantarainitiative.org
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma


Eve Maler                                  http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
+1 425 345 6756                         http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-uma/attachments/20140827/1b78882b/attachment.html>


More information about the WG-UMA mailing list