[WG-UMA] Privacy Engineering discussion deck
eve at xmlgrrl.com
Tue Aug 19 11:23:23 CDT 2014
BTW, I've just been taking a quick look at some of the artifacts produced by the PMRM and PbD-SE groups at OASIS as well. If anyone has been following those efforts closely enough to comment, can you suggest particular ways we could build on their use cases and analyses to help further the conversation?
On 15 Aug 2014, at 12:15 PM, Salvatore D'Agostino <sal at idmachines.com> wrote:
> Ok ;-)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eve Maler [mailto:eve at xmlgrrl.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 2:56 PM
> To: Salvatore D'Agostino
> Cc: WG UMA
> Subject: Re: [WG-UMA] Privacy Engineering discussion deck
> Who might be interested to go through the slide deck and make a few rough
> notes about "talking points" we could use on the concepts of Privacy
> Engineering? If someone else does a first draft, I can commit to doing some
> revision on top of that. We could do it in a Google Doc if that suits.
> On 15 Aug 2014, at 8:13 AM, Salvatore D'Agostino <sal at idmachines.com> wrote:
>> +1, how should we do this?
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: wg-uma-bounces at kantarainitiative.org
>> [mailto:wg-uma-bounces at kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of Eve Maler
>> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2014 4:13 PM
>> To: WG UMA
>> Subject: [WG-UMA] Privacy Engineering discussion deck
>> What do people think about doing an "UMA analysis wrt Privacy Engineering"
>> writeup a la our "UMA/PbD" writeup (http://tinyurl.com/umapbd)?
>> Manageability, Context, Induced Disclosure, etc. are perhaps worth
>> commenting on with an UMA flavor.
>> Eve Maler http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
>> +1 425 345 6756 http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl
>> WG-UMA mailing list
>> WG-UMA at kantarainitiative.org
> Eve Maler http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
> +1 425 345 6756 http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl
Eve Maler http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
+1 425 345 6756 http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl
More information about the WG-UMA