[WG-UMA] Review UMA core spec rev8 rest of document

Cordny Nederkoorn cclnederkoorn at hotmail.com
Wed May 25 13:14:14 EDT 2011

Hi all,
this is my 2nd part of the testability-review for UMA core spec rev8.
The UMA error message returning from the AM in case of a token invalid response: UMA or HTTP? 
Is the error message indicating a malformed scope reg. request a UMA-error-message or HTTP-error-message?
4.3 Update Resource Set Description
In case of a HTTP 204 response message success), The 204 response MUST NOT include a message-body??
Why also not a HTTP error message when a previously registered resource meant to be updated was NOT found??
4.5 List Resource Set Descriptions
What if NO identifiers are found for this user, I would expect a HTTP 404 Not Found??
4.6 Example
Perhaps a good idea to write this as a use case also : prerequisites, flow etc.
That's it for now, see you all at Thursday's Telecon, where we could discuss these points if possible.
Feedback is very welcome.
Best, Cordny Nederkoorn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-uma/attachments/20110525/005acf84/attachment.html 

More information about the WG-UMA mailing list