[WG-UMA] Fwd: [woes] FW: JSON Web Token (JWT) and JSON Web Signature (JWS) now in separate specs
eve at xmlgrrl.com
Sun Mar 27 10:10:00 EDT 2011
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Mike Jones <Michael.Jones at microsoft.com>
> Date: March 27, 2011 2:10:07 AM PDT
> To: "woes at ietf.org" <woes at ietf.org>
> Subject: [woes] FW: JSON Web Token (JWT) and JSON Web Signature (JWS) now in separate specs
> Resending to WOES to make sure that it goes through, as I didn’t receive my copy from the list.
> From: Mike Jones
> Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 10:26 PM
> To: oauth at ietf.org; woes at ietf.org; openid-specs-ab at lists.openid.net
> Cc: openid-specs at lists.openid.net
> Subject: JSON Web Token (JWT) and JSON Web Signature (JWS) now in separate specs
> As promised, I have split the contents of the JWT spec draft-jones-json-web-token-01 into two simpler specs:
> These should have introduced no semantic changes from the previous spec.
> I then applied the feedback that I received since JWT -01 and created revised versions of the split specs:
> The only breaking change introduced was that x5t (X.509 Certificate Thumbprint) is now a SHA-1 hash of the DER-encoded certificate, rather than a SHA-256 has, as SHA-1 is the prevailing existing practice for certificate thumbprint calculations. See the Document History sections for details on each change made.
> .txt and .xml versions are also available. I plan to publish these as IETF drafts once the submission window re-opens on Monday. Feedback welcome!
> -- Mike
> P.S. Yes, work on the companion encryption spec is now under way…
> woes mailing list
> woes at ietf.org
Eve Maler http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
+1 425 345 6756 http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the WG-UMA