[WG-UMA] Fwd: [Wg-uma] "Authentication model" document

Eve Maler eve at xmlgrrl.com
Thu Jan 6 13:06:01 EST 2011



Begin forwarded message:

> From: Eve Maler <eve at xmlgrrl.com>
> Date: 1 October 2009 1:52:45 PM PDT
> To: WG UMA <wg-uma at kantarainitiative.org>
> Subject: [Wg-uma] "Authentication model" document
> 
> As you'll see from the question marks in this thing, it all sort of got squishy around the "requesting user".  At the time I wrote this, I wasn't yet thinking clearly about the same vs. other distinction when it came to the Authorizing vs. Requesting User; both cases need to be accounted for.  (Maybe this form of analysis will help Michael in his task?)
> 
> Also, I think the "step 0a/b/c" stuff is now slightly out of sync with the "modern" numbering of the ProtectServe steps -- maybe Paul can comment on whether that really makes a difference.
> 
> But I think this matrix brings home a point about the Consumer (Requester) as an actor that's involved much more dynamically and tentatively than the others.
> 
> Promise not to laugh...
> 
> 	Eve
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ProtectServe-Authn-Model.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 62728 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-uma/attachments/20110106/8fd915d6/attachment-0001.pdf 
-------------- next part --------------
> 
> 
> Eve Maler
> eve at xmlgrrl.com
> http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Wg-uma mailing list
> Wg-uma at kantarainitiative.org
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma_kantarainitiative.org


Eve Maler                                  http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
+1 425 345 6756                         http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl



More information about the WG-UMA mailing list