[WG-UMA] Lexicon madness

Maciej Machulak m.p.machulak at newcastle.ac.uk
Fri Feb 19 08:31:39 EST 2010


Eve,

Should we have a "primary resource user" or just a "protected resource user" ?

Cheers,
Maciej 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: wg-uma-bounces at kantarainitiative.org 
>[mailto:wg-uma-bounces at kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of Eve Maler
>Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 5:46 AM
>To: WG UMA
>Subject: [WG-UMA] Lexicon madness
>
>The set of terms is getting fairly large and hairy, but I 
>think if we have the diagrams available to help explain and 
>give context, it shouldn't be too bad to provide the 
>definitions in the actual spec.
>
>I came across some legalese that seemed to fit our 
>requirements for staying out of "contractual" language, while 
>still being actionable and (hopefully) enforceable in the 
>legal world.  So now I talk about access authorization terms 
>and representations (where the latter can be affirmative vs. 
>promissory, that is, statements of fact or promises).  I also 
>define policy.
>
>http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/uma/Lexicon
>
>(And note that I changed the custodial terms a bit to reflect 
>our discussion too.)
>
>Comments??
>
>	Eve
>
>Eve Maler
>eve at xmlgrrl.com
>http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
>
>_______________________________________________
>WG-UMA mailing list
>WG-UMA at kantarainitiative.org
>http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-uma
>


More information about the WG-UMA mailing list