[WG-P3] [SG-P3PF] For your consideration
mark at smartspecies.com
Wed May 25 08:16:45 EDT 2011
I have had a quick look comparing this ISO doc against ISTPA and they
appear consistent, from what I understood, ISTPA and FIDIS both
provided input into this ISO effort. Colin did you understand that
this was the case?
If so, it might be a good idea to invite some ISO/ISTPA/FIDIS
contributors to discuss in a P3 call.
On 25 May 2011, at 13:09, Colin Wallis wrote:
> OK, but it should. It was probably taken from an EU baseline but the
> idea is that any nation could profile it as a sub set. If it isn't
> able to do that, we're in trouble..given that the co-editor for
> 29100 is Sue Glueck from MSFT. 29101 has an Estonian editor with
> some US inputs. But what need sto be done is a quick mapping against
> ISTPA and if it maps ok, we should be ok there too..I suspect
> changes on that one though...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the WG-P3