[WG-P3] Towards a Unified Theory

John Bradley ve7jtb at ve7jtb.com
Fri Mar 11 12:10:23 EST 2011

Good plan, 

That however has to work across multiple protocols and likely within a trust framework of some sort.
Not a simple thing.

John B.
On 2011-03-11, at 2:02 PM, Susan Landau wrote:

> On 3/11/11 8:58 AM, John Bradley wrote:
>> ...
>> None of the protocols support the sort of notice that the privacy community is asking for.  The IdP has no in-band way to know what the SP is collecting the attribute for or what the consequence of not providing it is.
> OASIS PNRM, for which the Kantara P3WG liason, is working on a 
> closely-related issue, namely translating broad-sounding principles such 
> as notice into what this means in a technical context.    That is the 
> objective of this OASIS working group.
> Susan
> _______________________________________________
> WG-P3 mailing list
> WG-P3 at kantarainitiative.org
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-p3

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4767 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-p3/attachments/20110311/c1b87375/attachment.bin 

More information about the WG-P3 mailing list