[WG-P3] Towards a Unified Theory
ve7jtb at ve7jtb.com
Fri Mar 11 12:10:23 EST 2011
That however has to work across multiple protocols and likely within a trust framework of some sort.
Not a simple thing.
On 2011-03-11, at 2:02 PM, Susan Landau wrote:
> On 3/11/11 8:58 AM, John Bradley wrote:
>> None of the protocols support the sort of notice that the privacy community is asking for. The IdP has no in-band way to know what the SP is collecting the attribute for or what the consequence of not providing it is.
> OASIS PNRM, for which the Kantara P3WG liason, is working on a
> closely-related issue, namely translating broad-sounding principles such
> as notice into what this means in a technical context. That is the
> objective of this OASIS working group.
> WG-P3 mailing list
> WG-P3 at kantarainitiative.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 4767 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-p3/attachments/20110311/c1b87375/attachment.bin
More information about the WG-P3