[WG-P3] Next Privacy and Public Policy work group call: A special working session
susan.landau at privacyink.org
Wed Mar 9 19:00:22 EST 2011
On 3/9/11 4:06 PM, Mark Lizar wrote:
> Greetings All,
> The Privacy and Public Policy working group of the Kantara Initiative
> will hold its next telecom this Thursday (Friday in Asia/Pacific).
> This will be a special session to work on a presentation to the
> International Technical Advisory Committee (ITAC) that reports to the
> OECD, (I believe in June).
Apologies. I cannot make the call as it is the same time as the OASIS
call. I will also be missing next week's call due to being on
vacation. I should be able to call in on the 24th.
> A draft slide deck has been put together as a starting point (already
> sent to the list). The intention of this presentation is to give
> ITAC/OECD an understanding of what we are doing and where this is
> headed. To create a presentation that is also useful EIC in Berlin.
> The P3 slide deck is expected to take up to 5 slides.
Some comments on the slide deck since I won't be on the call.
I appreciate the effort, but I have some trouble with the slides, which
have a bit of a vaporware effect on me. My approach tends to be explicit
about what is there and what isn't, and would say instead this is what
we're trying for, this is how it fits in, this is what we'd like from
you (participation). The current set of slides make it appear that we
have more than we do. That said, I will comment on the slides from
where they are, rather than trying to transform into a very different set.
Slide 5: The second point is a non sequitor.
Slide 7: Do we really mean the first point on this slide? Or do we mean
enables a trust framework certification mechanism? In any case, I'm
lost here, since this doesn't seem to be about P3WG but about Kantara
Second point on slide: hold who accountable?
Slide 8: Add: in "privacy" to "profiles." It would be useful to have a
couple of examples here. I am finding the language sufficiently general
as to be completely lost as to what is being presented. I'm afraid the
audience will also be lost.
Slide 9: Again, give me some examples. Otherwise this is slippery and
it is hard to know what is meant.
Slide 10: I would put this ahead of Slide 9. I would precede it with
I hope my comments are useful. Again my apologies for missing so many
calls in a row.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the WG-P3