[Wg-p3] Agenda for next P3 call

Mark Lizar info at smartspecies.com
Thu Oct 29 07:24:39 EDT 2009


and a recommendation to support (in our efforts) the Council of Europe  
law draft recommendation  in regards to 'AUTOMATIC PROCESSING OF  


On 28 Oct 2009, at 19:44, Susan Landau wrote:
> I suggest that a useful way to shift the conversation is ask that  
> prior
> to mass deployment, privacy-invasive technologies (all  
> technologies?) be
> subject to an evaluation of their effectiveness.  This should also be
> done before the scope of the technologies' uses change.

Delaying the time and requiring a standard in adoption is also a great  
strategy for a standard incubating community.

> That has many effects, including raising the cost of the technology  
> (but
> lowering the cost to society if the technology is not actually
> effective) and slowing its deployment, and supporters of new
> technologies will not be happy with such an approach.  But it is also
> hard to argue with.  It is about moving the discussion from, "Yes, of
> course it works" to "It has been subject to a rigorous scientific
> evaluation which showed ..."

Best Regards


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-p3/attachments/20091029/3fd7c997/attachment.html 

More information about the Wg-p3 mailing list