[WG-OTTO] Ethereum - Multichain - Namecoin

Jim Willeke jim at willeke.com
Thu Nov 5 08:59:38 CST 2015


Maybe more fun and confusion   https://github.com/okTurtles/dnschain
;)

--
-jim
Jim Willeke

On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Mike Schwartz <mike at gluu.org> wrote:

> OTTO WG,
>
> I'm more confused than ever. I spents a few hours yesterday looking at
> Etherium, Multichain and Namecoin.
>
> It seems like Etherium offers more flexibility to code, but I have no idea
> if the business model is feasible--who would pay for transactions and
> storage?
>
> Mutlichain looks interesting because you can create a private blockchain,
> but who would do the mining? Also, this is a fork of bitcoin, so would it
> have the features we want?
>
> Namecoin looks really intersting, and I wonder if we should fork that code
> to support our federation use case... I was looking at the specification
> yesterday:
>   https://wiki.namecoin.org/index.php?title=Domain_Name_Specification
>   and the FAQ:
>   https://wiki.namecoin.org/index.php?title=FAQ
> Perhaps leveraging DNS to resolve our federation services makes sense
> after all...
>
> - Mike
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WG-OTTO mailing list
> WG-OTTO at kantarainitiative.org
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-otto
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-otto/attachments/20151105/f24c2956/attachment.html>


More information about the WG-OTTO mailing list