[WG-InfoSharing] user record of consents granted

Info@SS info at smartspecies.com
Tue Mar 12 15:17:41 UTC 2019

Hi Tom,

The dashboard is a demo concept at this time. So not really congruent with this post. Is this post in response to the demo or more in general, best practices for consent management with identity management ? 

A few approaches for exploring receipt storage at this time,   

- the client like digi.me 
- the server - hosted by the receipt provider 
- the pod 
- make  consent an event and give its own identity -  COEL - using pseudonymous identifiers - 
- Consent on the Block Chain - Hyperledger 

Does this get into answering your question?  Not the type of question that can be constrained by the topic of VRM.  The VRM reference is something I can sympathise with.  But, I think the scope of consent and its identity management incarnations is a generally a bigger issue that encapsulates VRM.  

- Mark 

> On 7 Mar 2019, at 16:52, Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones at gmail.com> wrote:
> While this is an interesting avenue to peruse, it is not "some thing new in the world". This idea was described in Doc Searls book "The intention economy" and is the primary work product of the vendor relationship management (VRM) group that has been sputtering along for years.
> The core challenge behind this idea is whether the db should be on the user's device, or in the cloud. There are rabid partisans on both views, especially as to the issue of privacy and user control of their own data. While most groups try to avoid the problem, by saying it is user choice, the solution to the problem is key to a successful adoption.
> I would appreciate hearing about how the existing implementations of the "dashboard" handle the location and security of the user data.
> Peace ..tom
> _______________________________________________
> WG-InfoSharing mailing list
> WG-InfoSharing at kantarainitiative.org
> https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-infosharing

More information about the WG-InfoSharing mailing list