[WG-InfoSharing] WG-InfoSharing Digest, Vol 105, Issue 3

Tom Jones thomasclinganjones at gmail.com
Sat Aug 4 18:55:52 UTC 2018


While I support Mark's request for alignment with GDPR, I would also
support alignment with the California regulation, in part because I am
interested in improving that regulation as it roles out in other
jurisdictions. As important as the EU might be, I suspect their efforts to
export those to other parts of the world will fail.

N.b. the problem with pii as a term is that it is not descriptive of the
problem as understood today. In fact there are NO personal attributes that
are not pii, so it's misleading at best. What I really need to understand
is what user information needs user consent to share. I suspect there will
never be agreements with the European countries on that.

thx ..Tom (mobile)

On Sat, Aug 4, 2018, 5:00 AM <wg-infosharing-request at kantarainitiative.org>
wrote:

> Send WG-InfoSharing mailing list submissions to
>         wg-infosharing at kantarainitiative.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-infosharing
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         wg-infosharing-request at kantarainitiative.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         wg-infosharing-owner at kantarainitiative.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of WG-InfoSharing digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Critical CR and CISWG Issue and Solution (Mark Lizar)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 14:10:24 +0100
> From: Mark Lizar <mark at openconsent.com>
> To: "wg-infosharing at kantarainitiative.org"
>         <wg-infosharing at kantarainitiative.org>
> Subject: [WG-InfoSharing] Critical CR and CISWG Issue and Solution
> Message-ID: <60173568-227D-4FF4-9B9E-AF3FE829C9B2 at openconsent.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> HI CISWG,
>
>
> It has increasingly come to my attention, that the Consent Receipt work is
> coming under attack.    People in  and out of our community have been
> talking about how operationally unsuitable the consetn receipt
> specification is, and as we have not produce a lot documentation about why
> it was built this way.  This is understandable.
>
> In addition, we have not provided the GDPR update, for the CR. Which I
> believe would go a long way towards explaining the CR for us.
>
>  For example statements like this:
>
> "The Consent Receipt uses obsolete technical terms like "Personally
> Identifiable Information (PII)" rather than the more generic term from the
> GDPR of Personal Information <
> http://tcwiki.azurewebsites.net/index.php?title=Personal_Information&action=edit&redlink=1>
> or the more descriptive of what we should control Personal Private
> Information <
> http://tcwiki.azurewebsites.net/index.php?title=Personal_Private_Information&action=edit&redlink=1>,
> although with the Right to be Forgotten <
> http://tcwiki.azurewebsites.net/index.php?title=Right_to_be_Forgotten&action=edit&redlink=1>
> there may no distinction between those two terms in the EU.?
>
>
> Statements like these are understandable but mis-informed,because;
>
> 1. The consent receipt uses international lexicon not a jurisdictional
> lexicon that is only relevant in a jurisdiction, this is for
> A) international use. - all the systems in the world dont use GDPR, and
> GDPR with all its greatness has many flaws - for example it is focus on
> Data Protection not so much Privacy.  Something this WG is very aware of.
>
> B) It references on OECD and FIPS  and terms like PII - so that the
> receipt spec will be backwards compatible - with the existing global
> infratructure, not one that is emerging over the next 5 years and only
> enforced in 28 countries.
>
> Ether way, I think its really important to get a GDPR Extension for our CR
> together and into the WG, and out for the community of CR adopters that
> support this work, before My Data.
>
> To this end,
>
> 1. would there be any objections for a CISWG funding application to the
> Kantara Board of Directors for an Editor and funds to cover the costs the
> initial authoring the a CR v1.1 GDPR spec extension and its contribution to
> this WG?
>
> 2. Are there any supporters for this action to happen asap?
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
> Mark Lizar | Open Consent | 22 Wenlock Rd, London|  N1 7GU
> P +44 (0) 208 123-2476 | E mark at openconsent.com
> | Twitter @smartopian | Web https://www.openconsent.com |
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-infosharing/attachments/20180803/de395488/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> WG-InfoSharing mailing list
> WG-InfoSharing at kantarainitiative.org
> https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-infosharing
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of WG-InfoSharing Digest, Vol 105, Issue 3
> **********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-infosharing/attachments/20180804/103a3591/attachment.html>


More information about the WG-InfoSharing mailing list