[WG-InfoSharing] Review CR 1.1.0 DRAFT 5

David Turner david.turner at voltagegate.com
Mon Oct 30 19:51:20 UTC 2017


Thanks Mark.

 

From: Mark Lizar [mailto:mark at openconsent.com] 
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2017 8:54 PM
To: David Turner <david.turner at voltagegate.com>
Cc: wg-infosharing at kantarainitiative.org
Subject: Re: [WG-InfoSharing] Review CR 1.1.0 DRAFT 5

 

(Deep Bow) 

 

Thanks David for the great editing work. 

 

Mark 

 

 

 

On 27 Oct 2017, at 18:17, David Turner <david.turner at voltagegate.com <mailto:david.turner at voltagegate.com> > wrote:

 

Hello All, 

 

DRAFT 5 is now on the wiki:

*        Marked up version -  <https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/download/attachments/76447870/Consent%20Receipt%20Specification%201_1_0%20DRAFT%205a.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1508987029000&api=v2> Consent Receipt Specification 1_1_0 DRAFT 5a.docx

*        Clean version -  <https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/download/attachments/76447870/Consent%20Receipt%20Specification%201_1_0%20DRAFT%205a%20-%20clean.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1508987041000&api=v2> Consent Receipt Specification 1_1_0 DRAFT 5a - clean.docx

*        JSON schema -  <https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/download/attachments/76447870/CR%20Schema%20v1_1_0%20DRAFT%205.json?version=1&modificationDate=1508987053000&api=v2> CR Schema v1_1_0 DRAFT 5.json

 

Please submit your comments and proposed changes to this list using a marked-up version of the Word doc or a description that uses the document's line numbers.If you want something changed or added, please provide a specific proposal for the changed/new text. It is not sufficient to say, "this paragraph requires elaboration"

without suggesting new text.

 

The deadline for this round of comments is Nov 9. 
---------------------------------------------
I want to highlight a few things:

1.	I made significant changes to the layout and structure of the document:

1.	Table 1 and Table 2 have been combined into a single list; and
2.	All normative parts of the document are now in one section.  

2.	I added some "editor's comments" to the document. They are the bright yellow text boxes with a red border. They are meant to highlight specific issues.

One issue I want to call out is my proposal for changing the section of the schema for 'purpose'. (This is the same as the editor's comment at line 355.) I propose changing ‘purposes’ to type: object, creating a new element called ‘purpose’, type: object, and renaming the current ‘purpose’ element to ‘purposeDesc’. This will give a cleaner and less ambiguous JSON structure.

 

-----------------------------------

Current structure:

 

purposes

    purposeDesc

    consentType

    etc.

    purposeDesc

    consentType

    etc.

-----------------------------------
Proposed structure:

purposes

    purpose

        purposeDesc

        consentType

        etc.

    purpose

        purposeDesc

        consentType

        etc.

-----------------------------------

 

I'm also proposing we do the same for "piiController' and 'service".

 

David

 

 

_______________________________________________
WG-InfoSharing mailing list
WG-InfoSharing at kantarainitiative.org <mailto:WG-InfoSharing at kantarainitiative.org> 
https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-infosharing

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-infosharing/attachments/20171030/d6d74aff/attachment.html>


More information about the WG-InfoSharing mailing list