[WG-InfoSharing] CR 1.1.0 DRAFT 6 just posted
john at wunderlich.ca
Mon Nov 20 15:35:57 UTC 2017
Nice work, as always.
Quibbles and picking of nits as follows:
Line 56: I prefer 'good practices' to 'best practices' to avoid downstream
arguments about which practice is 'best' when all we usually need to find
Line 386: Consent Type
Note that where the service is 'meeting regulatory requirements' or the
like, consent is moot. Therefore either N/A or something like it should be
an acceptable consent type.
Line 412: Third Party Name
The definition says name or names. Does that not mean that this should be
an array in JSON?
Page 23: There are some duplications in the names here and in the front
matter. Is that intentional or accidental? Not sure what the difference
between the two types of contributor is?
Page 27: If possible this should be a legal size page in landscape mode for
the table to display
John Wunderlich, BA, MBA
Kantara Initiative <https://kantarainitiative.org/>: Consent Receipt
JLINC Labs <https://www.jlinclabs.com/>: Data Provenance Solutions
On 19 November 2017 at 23:25, David Turner <david.turner at voltagegate.com>
> Hello all,
> I just uploaded DRAFT 6, which should be the final version. PLEASE review
> if before the next meeting and send any issues to me via the mailing list.
> Thank you,
> WG-InfoSharing mailing list
> WG-InfoSharing at kantarainitiative.org
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient
you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the WG-InfoSharing