[WG-InfoSharing] Any topics for CIS WG call this week?

Mark Lizar mark at openconsent.com
Wed Nov 1 18:41:45 UTC 2017

HI Andrew, 

Besides working out what is next for the consent receipt, like extension protocol.  There is a need for discussing what to do to support  the CR spec. 

If there are any requests for what to focus on next, as well as for listing/discussing what it takes to implement the protocol. 

Its probably a good time to open up the next steps for the Consent receipt to the Kantara community, including UMA,  and to take suggestions on what to focus on next.   I suspect there is a lot of demand guidance on the use of consent receipts and that this should be a work group activity - proving us with a reason not never cancel a work group call. 

- Mark 

> On 1 Nov 2017, at 16:25, Andrew Hughes <andrewhughes3000 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi - David reports that he has received no comments from WG on the latest draft.
> Does anyone need Thursday's call to discuss any issues?
> If not, then I'd like to cancel the call.
> andrew.
> Andrew Hughes CISM CISSP 
> Independent Consultant
> In Turn Information Management Consulting
> o  +1 650.209.7542
> m +1 250.888.9474
> 1249 Palmer Road,
> Victoria, BC V8P 2H8
> AndrewHughes3000 at gmail.com <mailto:AndrewHughes3000 at gmail.com> 
> ca.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-hughes/a/58/682/ <http://ca.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-hughes/a/58/682/>
> Identity Management | IT Governance | Information Security 
> _______________________________________________
> WG-InfoSharing mailing list
> WG-InfoSharing at kantarainitiative.org
> https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-infosharing

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-infosharing/attachments/20171101/5526474b/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the WG-InfoSharing mailing list