[WG-InfoSharing] ICO Guidance on Consent

Mark Lizar - OCG m.lizar at openconsentgroup.com
Sun Mar 19 15:51:18 CDT 2017


Ok - good advice, 

What if I ask for comment by 26th of March? 

- Mark 

> On 19 Mar 2017, at 20:49, Iain Henderson <iainhenderson at mac.com> wrote:
> 
> Fine by me.
> 
> I suggest we circulate final draft for comment to the various contributing groups by end this week for submission before the end March deadline?
> 
> Iain
> 
> 
>> On 19 Mar 2017, at 20:32, Mark Lizar - OCG <m.lizar at openconsentgroup.com <mailto:m.lizar at openconsentgroup.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi CISWG, 
>> 
>> Does anyone mind if I open comment input from the My Data consent Track and Digital Catapult? 
>> 
>>  The idea here being that I advertise to them this week offering a place for comments on this pioneering guidance effort.  If you object to expanding the scope please speak up on the list or contact me directly .
>> 
>> Best Regards, 
>> 
>> Mark 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 9 Mar 2017, at 11:35, Mark Lizar - OCG <m.lizar at openconsentgroup.com <mailto:m.lizar at openconsentgroup.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello CISWG, 
>>> 
>>> After  a couple of years of work - it turns out that we have anticipated the need for consent records and proof of consent.  Finally, guidance from a regular that the consent receipt can use. 
>>> 
>>> Does anyone have any comments, questions, or discussion points.  Favourite bits of guidance? 
>>> 
>>> - Mark
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 2 Mar 2017, at 22:41, Iain Henderson <iainhenderson at mac.com <mailto:iainhenderson at mac.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, I think we should respond as CISWG/ Kantara to the short consultation (by 31st March), and also to this one referenced for later in the year.
>>>> 
>>>> That won’t be the end of our work on consent. Later in the year we are planning to issue a call for evidence to get a better sense of what technical solutions are available or are being developed for obtaining and managing consent.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 2 Mar 2017, at 17:54, Mark OCG <m.lizar at openconsentgroup.com <mailto:m.lizar at openconsentgroup.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Now Published for Public Consultation
>>>>> 
>>>>> http://bit.ly/ico-consent <http://bit.ly/ico-consent>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Happy to take comments in this thread to pass forward as an Official CISWG response if the group approves. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> - Mark 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> WG-InfoSharing mailing list
>>>>> WG-InfoSharing at kantarainitiative.org <mailto:WG-InfoSharing at kantarainitiative.org>
>>>>> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-infosharing <http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-infosharing>
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> WG-InfoSharing mailing list
>>>> WG-InfoSharing at kantarainitiative.org <mailto:WG-InfoSharing at kantarainitiative.org>
>>>> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-infosharing <http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-infosharing>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> WG-InfoSharing mailing list
>>> WG-InfoSharing at kantarainitiative.org <mailto:WG-InfoSharing at kantarainitiative.org>
>>> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-infosharing <http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-infosharing>
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WG-InfoSharing mailing list
> WG-InfoSharing at kantarainitiative.org
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-infosharing

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-infosharing/attachments/20170319/fdca15aa/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the WG-InfoSharing mailing list