[WG-InfoSharing] REMINDER: Re: Current set of proposed response to comments

Iain Henderson iainhenderson at mac.com
Wed Mar 8 11:15:24 CST 2017

Ok thanks, I have already sent the annotated human readable consent receipt that I submitted in the process but which was not in the sheet. So perhaps we talk briefly on that.

Beyond that, I'd like to discuss next steps on the data portability work strand; the GDPR clock is ticking on that one.



> On 8 Mar 2017, at 17:28, Andrew Hughes <andrewhughes3000 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone - just a reminder that unless flagged (I hope in advance) we will not discuss proposed dispositions of individual comments on this week's CIS WG call. 
> So, in your review of the comments spreadsheet circulated by David on March 3 please notify this list of any items that need further discussion. 
> thanks
> andrew.
> =======
> In the March 9, 2017 meeting all CR comments on the spreadsheet with David's proposed disposition of 'Accept', 'Reject' or 'Noted' will be confirmed as indicated using a WG motion.
> Similarly, all CR comments with a proposed disposition of 'NextVer' will be confirmed for consideration in version 1.1 of the CR using a WG motion.
> If you wish to discuss the disposition of any of those comments during the WG call or prior, please say so on this distribution list.
> thanks
> andrew.
> Andrew Hughes CISM CISSP 
> Independent Consultant
> In Turn Information Management Consulting
> o  +1 650.209.7542
> m +1 250.888.9474
> 1249 Palmer Road,
> Victoria, BC V8P 2H8
> AndrewHughes3000 at gmail.com 
> ca.linkedin.com/pub/andrew-hughes/a/58/682/
> Identity Management | IT Governance | Information Security 
>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:03 AM, David Turner <david.turner at voltagegate.com> wrote:
>> The attached spreadsheet contains the comments received for v1 and the current set of proposed responses as of the WG call on 2017-03-02. Please review the proposed responses and send your comments to the list. Please indicate if you think a particular comment should be discussed in the next WG call on Thursday, Mar 9. The goal is to have changes finalized during that call and to have a new document published for a vote in a week. 
>> Thank you,
>> David
>> _______________________________________________
>> WG-InfoSharing mailing list
>> WG-InfoSharing at kantarainitiative.org
>> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-infosharing
> <Consent Receipt Specification V1.0.0_Comment Submissions-response 2017-03-02 (1).xlsx>
> _______________________________________________
> WG-InfoSharing mailing list
> WG-InfoSharing at kantarainitiative.org
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-infosharing
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-infosharing/attachments/20170308/42abf92d/attachment.html>

More information about the WG-InfoSharing mailing list