[WG-InfoSharing] Interesting Review of P3P

Justin Richer jricher at mit.edu
Thu Mar 24 07:43:12 CDT 2016


This is exactly why it's important to define a standardized 
representation of the receipt (the signed JWT in our case) and have a 
reference implementation available of that standard.

  -- Justin

On 3/24/2016 4:16 AM, Iain Henderson wrote:
> Yes, useful thanks. Most pertinent points from the paper from my 
> perspective are:
>
> '
>
> Web sites build to the implementation, not the specification
>
>
> and
>
>
> Keep it simple
>
>> On 23 Mar 2016, at 19:28, Mark Lizar - OCG 
>> <m.lizar at openconsentgroup.com <mailto:m.lizar at openconsentgroup.com>> 
>> wrote:
>>
>> <P3P_Retro_Final_0.pdf>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WG-InfoSharing mailing list
> WG-InfoSharing at kantarainitiative.org
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-infosharing

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-infosharing/attachments/20160324/af692fb5/attachment.html>


More information about the WG-InfoSharing mailing list