[WG-InfoSharing] Reminder of Meeting Thursday 27th (US Thanks Giving Meeting)

Mark Lizar mark at smartspecies.com
Thu Nov 27 10:22:22 CST 2014


HI Iain, 

Thanks, this is great input, yes I will make it clear and I agree it is important to highlight that  boundary between WG and other efforts. 

I will add the detail below re: the horizontal architecture and use case to the brief and re-send it before the meeting tonight. 

Thanks Iain, 


On 27 Nov 2014, at 08:21, Iain Henderson <iainhenderson at mac.com> wrote:

> Hi Mark, one thing missing from the notes as they stand is that we discussed ‘site registration’ as the most high impact use case to tackle; i.e. I register on a site/ service for the first time and I get the receipt denoting the consents given at point of registration. That was in the context we discussed around the consent receipt having horizontal applicability rather than as a vertical, 
> 
> That is the use case I provided to the developer to give an estimate on. 
> 
> The grant proposal needs a tweak to reflect that, around the line below.
> 
> 'The Consent receipt will be specific  to a market or niche (still not decided)'
> 
> I also find the references to Open Notice Registry in the grant application a bit confusing; in the work group we need to constrain our activity to the remit and scope we have agreed, i.e. building specifications and standards. If Open Notice wishes to then use the spec to do something then so much the better, but it is not part of our scope.
> 
> I have not as yet heard back from Customer Commons on the option for that legal entity to be the keeper of the standard; we did not meet last week and are unlikely to do so this week due to the US holiday.
> 
> I’ll try to join the call tonight but might well not make it. Happy to iterate by email in advance or afterwards.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Iain
> 
> 
> 
>> On 25 Nov 2014, at 16:17, Mark Lizar <mark at smartspecies.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello All, 
>> 
>> I apologise for the poor notes.  I had lost my first set of notes, then my second.  So I have lost the MVCR version roadmap notes.  So, we will need to address this again. The good news is that the timeout on the wiki is now extended from 30 min to 120 min. 
>> 
>> I have drafted a small budget request to produce an Alpha demonstrator of the MVCR spec. Please find this attached. 
>> 
>> In addition we have a meeting this Thursday. 
>> 
>> Agenda, 
>> 
>> 	• Liaisons and Updates
>> 	• Action Items
>> 	• Review/Work on Budget Request
>> 	• Planning the Architecture for the MVCR demonstrator
>> 	• AOB
>> Call Details.
>> 
>> (note all call details and schedule have been updated on the Kantara calendar and are on the wiki) 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Teleconferences:
>> 
>> 	• Dial-in Details
>> 	• Skype: +99051000000481
>> 	• US: +1-805-309-2350
>> 	• UK: +44.20.3137.5285
>> 	• Conference ID: 613-2898
>> <MVCR Budget Request - 2014 v.1.docx>_______________________________________________
>> WG-InfoSharing mailing list
>> WG-InfoSharing at kantarainitiative.org
>> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/wg-infosharing
> 
> This email and any attachment contains information which is private and confidential and is intended for the addressee only. If you are not an addressee, you are not authorised to read, copy or use the e-mail or any attachment. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and then destroy it.
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-infosharing/attachments/20141127/318cfafe/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/wg-infosharing/attachments/20141127/318cfafe/attachment.sig>


More information about the WG-InfoSharing mailing list