[KI-LC] A thought about Projects vs Groups

Jim Pasquale jim at digi.me
Tue Nov 12 15:38:29 UTC 2019


I couldn’t agree more Colin, the Chairs of both CIS & CMS have been moving towards project based initiatives base on two simple reason, not everyone in a WG have the same depth or interest in a general topic of challenge.  Resulting in fewer people contributing to the overall group goal, where projects inside of an over arching WG with project contributing to say a general WG called Information Sharing allows for smaller teams to work on specific project they are both interested in and have some level of skin in the game, for whatever the reason.

I like the idea!

On Nov 12, 2019, at 7:00 AM, lc-request at kantarainitiative.org<mailto:lc-request at kantarainitiative.org> wrote:

Send LC mailing list submissions to
lc at kantarainitiative.org<mailto:lc at kantarainitiative.org>

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc<https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
lc-request at kantarainitiative.org<mailto:lc-request at kantarainitiative.org>

You can reach the person managing the list at
lc-owner at kantarainitiative.org<mailto:lc-owner at kantarainitiative.org>

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of LC digest..."
Today's Topics:

  1. A thought about Projects vs Groups (Colin Wallis Kantara)

From: Colin Wallis Kantara <colin at kantarainitiative.org<mailto:colin at kantarainitiative.org>>
Subject: [KI-LC] A thought about Projects vs Groups
Date: November 11, 2019 at 11:42:47 AM EST
To: Kantara Leadership Council <lc at kantarainitiative.org<mailto:lc at kantarainitiative.org>>


Greetings Chairs

I was on a call today with Mark Farmer, Virtual Inc's Sponsorship lead. As we chatted, he drew some parallels with some similar orgs that are clients of theirs and mentioned one that relies on sponsorship significantly, has moved away from groups, and actually just does projects... over 100 of them in this case.

Thinking about how we get tangled up with different projects in one group which is bound to one IPR regime, I had the thought that it might be a way forward for us too.

What do you think?



_______________________________________________
LC mailing list
LC at kantarainitiative.org<mailto:LC at kantarainitiative.org>
https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc

Disclaimer

The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this email in error, please delete it and advise the sender.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/lc/attachments/20191112/9e09b566/attachment.html>


More information about the LC mailing list