[KI-LC] New WG Charter proposal

mary hodder hodder at gmail.com
Tue Jan 15 22:36:56 UTC 2019

Hi Ken,
Wondering if we could discuss some of your comments. There are a few things
you say that I don't understand, or it's possible you are not understanding
what we mean to say (which means we need to improve our language).

Could we discuss? I would imagine others in the agile group will want to

Thank you,

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 6:15 PM Ken Dagg <kendaggtbs at gmail.com> wrote:

> Andrew,
> A comments / questions:
> 1) I’m confused by these words in the Purpose section: “A variety of
> identifiers appropriate for personal data must be trusted at a wide variety
> of relying parties and applied throughout different profiles. An Identity
> ecosystem requires reliable identity and federations of all sorts, and
> both highly structured and distributed identities.” To me they don’t add
> anything but, in my opinion, confusion and I’d recommend deleting them.
> 2) I don’t find that these words in the Scope section add anything: “to
> help identity ecosystem participants and individuals with their identity
> and personal data management”. They duplicate what is said in the Purpose
> section and, again in my opinion, are out of place. I’d recommend that they
> be deleted.
> 3) In the Scope section, I’d suggest that this text: “NOTE: Examples of
> work to be taken up by the committee are found here: FIRE WG Committee
> Work List
> <https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/idef/FIRE+WG+Committee+Work+List>
>  L
> <https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/idef/FIRE+WG+Committee+Work+List>
> ist
> <https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/idef/FIRE+WG+Committee+Work> but
> a consolidated list is noted below“ be moved to after the bulleted list to
> improve readability. Where it appears I found it distracting.
> 4) I’d recommend changing the word “may” to “will” in the Draft Technical
> Specifications section. That would make the sentence, “The following
> technical specifications will be developed in 2018-19:” Status reporting
> can then report on progress including reasons why they have not been
> developed.
> 5) Is there a reason the IAWG isn’t in the list of Related Work and
> Liaisons?
> My two cents,
> Ken
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 8:29 PM Andrew Hughes <andrewhughes3000 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Hi folks - part of the IDESG that came over to Kantara this summer have
>> been working towards setting up a WG to cover their work on the IDESG
>> Registry system.
>> Please review the draft charter at the link below and send comments back
>> to the list. I hope to run an eBallot before the end of the year.
>> https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/idef/Proposed+charter+v2+-+Agile+meeting+version
>> thanks!
>> andrew.
>> *Andrew Hughes *CISM CISSP
>> *In Turn Information Management Consulting*
>> o  +1 650.209.7542
>> m +1 250.888.9474
>> 1249 Palmer Road, Victoria, BC V8P 2H8
>> AndrewHughes3000 at gmail.com
>> *https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-hughes-682058a
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-hughes-682058a>*
>> *Digital Identity | International Standards | Information Security *
>> _______________________________________________
>> LC mailing list
>> LC at kantarainitiative.org
>> https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
> --
> Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication
> 613-825-2091 kendaggtbs at gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> LC mailing list
> LC at kantarainitiative.org
> https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/lc/attachments/20190115/e06e594c/attachment.html>

More information about the LC mailing list