[KI-LC] Proposal for a new specification at Kantara - please weigh in!

Scott Shorter scott.shorter at gmail.com
Thu Oct 4 22:02:59 UTC 2018


One more +1 from me.


On 10/04/2018 05:56 PM, Colin Wallis Kantara wrote:
> Folks
>
> Taking this once more around the buoy for final comments.
>
> They approached me today on this on a Slack channel so they are keen 
> enough, if they are asking the question second time.
>
> Question is, are we keen enough... Ken and Sal and Andrew have given 
> it the thumbs up.
>
> Last call...
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:31 AM Colin Wallis Kantara 
> <colin at kantarainitiative.org <mailto:colin at kantarainitiative.org>> wrote:
>
>     It looks a bit like code lists from OASIS-OPEN CIQ xPRL.
>     That work hasn't been maintained but might be a useful reference.
>
>     On Thu, 13 Sep 2018, 02:57 Salvatore D'Agostino,
>     <sal at idmachines.com <mailto:sal at idmachines.com>> wrote:
>
>         Likely to be some relationship among the attributes in the
>         taxonomy..  is it encrypt all or some, probably your SIM is a
>         good thing to include… nice list, here’s a spreadsheet
>
>         *From:* LC <lc-bounces at kantarainitiative.org
>         <mailto:lc-bounces at kantarainitiative.org>> *On Behalf Of *Ken Dagg
>         *Sent:* Wednesday, September 12, 2018 7:13 PM
>         *To:* Andrew Hughes <andrewhughes3000 at gmail.com
>         <mailto:andrewhughes3000 at gmail.com>>
>         *Cc:* Kantara Leadership Council <lc at kantarainitiative.org
>         <mailto:lc at kantarainitiative.org>>
>         *Subject:* Re: [KI-LC] Proposal for a new specification at
>         Kantara - please weigh in!
>
>         Andrew,
>
>         Interesting idea. From what I can see, from the information at
>         the link, they want to develop common standards to help
>         protect the privacy of personally identifiable information (PII).
>
>         In my opinion, it could be an ideal topic for a WG. What could
>         also be interesting is the impact of the output of the WG on
>         other WGs such as PrivWG, HIAWG, and IAWG. For IAWG it could
>         mean additional criteria for the Classic SAC. It could also be
>         used to influence NIST and therefore the two sets of SAC
>         related to 800-63Rev3.
>
>         My two cents,
>
>         Ken
>
>         On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:18 PM Andrew Hughes
>         <andrewhughes3000 at gmail.com
>         <mailto:andrewhughes3000 at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>             Hi - I spotted this work form Dativa.com last week:
>
>             https://www.dativa.com/blinding-identity-taxonomy/
>
>             It's a taxonomy of PII elements that "require
>             cryptographic encoding to prevent the identification of
>             individuals..."
>
>             I've chatted a bit with them, and they are interested in
>             making it into an open standard. I suggested that Kantara
>             might be a good home, among other possibilities.
>
>             What are your thoughts?
>
>             I, for one, think that it would be a good item for
>             Information Sharing topics.
>
>             andrew.
>
>             *Andrew Hughes *CISM CISSP
>             *In Turn Information Management Consulting*
>
>             o  +1 650.209.7542
>             m +1 250.888.9474
>             1249 Palmer Road, Victoria, BC V8P 2H8
>             AndrewHughes3000 at gmail.com <mailto:AndrewHughes3000 at gmail.com>
>             _https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-hughes-682058a_
>             *Digital Identity | International Standards | Information
>             Security *
>
>             _______________________________________________
>             LC mailing list
>             LC at kantarainitiative.org <mailto:LC at kantarainitiative.org>
>             https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
>
>         -- 
>
>         Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and
>         Authentication 613-825-2091 kendaggtbs at gmail.com
>         <mailto:kendaggtbs at gmail.com>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         LC mailing list
>         LC at kantarainitiative.org <mailto:LC at kantarainitiative.org>
>         https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LC mailing list
> LC at kantarainitiative.org
> https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/lc/attachments/20181004/ee0b9112/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the LC mailing list