[KI-LC] Proposal for a new specification at Kantara - please weigh in!

Colin Wallis Kantara colin at kantarainitiative.org
Thu Oct 4 21:56:46 UTC 2018


Folks

Taking this once more around the buoy for final comments.

They approached me today on this on a Slack channel so they are keen
enough, if they are asking the question second time.

Question is, are we keen enough... Ken and Sal and Andrew have given it the
thumbs up.

Last call...

Cheers


On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:31 AM Colin Wallis Kantara <
colin at kantarainitiative.org> wrote:

> It looks a bit like code lists from OASIS-OPEN CIQ xPRL.
> That work hasn't been maintained but might be a useful reference.
>
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2018, 02:57 Salvatore D'Agostino, <sal at idmachines.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Likely to be some relationship among the attributes in the taxonomy..  is
>> it encrypt all or some, probably your SIM is a good thing to include… nice
>> list, here’s a spreadsheet
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* LC <lc-bounces at kantarainitiative.org> *On Behalf Of *Ken Dagg
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 12, 2018 7:13 PM
>> *To:* Andrew Hughes <andrewhughes3000 at gmail.com>
>> *Cc:* Kantara Leadership Council <lc at kantarainitiative.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [KI-LC] Proposal for a new specification at Kantara -
>> please weigh in!
>>
>>
>>
>> Andrew,
>>
>>
>>
>> Interesting idea. From what I can see, from the information at the link,
>> they want to develop common standards to help protect the privacy of
>> personally identifiable information (PII).
>>
>>
>>
>> In my opinion, it could be an ideal topic for a WG. What could also be
>> interesting is the impact of the output of the WG on other WGs such as
>> PrivWG, HIAWG, and IAWG. For IAWG it could mean additional criteria for the
>> Classic SAC. It could also be used to influence NIST and therefore the two
>> sets of SAC related to 800-63Rev3.
>>
>>
>>
>> My two cents,
>>
>> Ken
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 6:18 PM Andrew Hughes <andrewhughes3000 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi - I spotted this work form Dativa.com last week:
>>
>> https://www.dativa.com/blinding-identity-taxonomy/
>>
>>
>>
>> It's a taxonomy of PII elements that "require cryptographic encoding to
>> prevent the identification of individuals..."
>>
>>
>>
>> I've chatted a bit with them, and they are interested in making it into
>> an open standard. I suggested that Kantara might be a good home, among
>> other possibilities.
>>
>>
>>
>> What are your thoughts?
>>
>> I, for one, think that it would be a good item for Information Sharing
>> topics.
>>
>>
>>
>> andrew.
>>
>> *Andrew Hughes *CISM CISSP
>> *In Turn Information Management Consulting*
>>
>> o  +1 650.209.7542
>> m +1 250.888.9474
>> 1249 Palmer Road, Victoria, BC V8P 2H8
>> AndrewHughes3000 at gmail.com
>> *https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-hughes-682058a
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-hughes-682058a>*
>> *Digital Identity | International Standards | Information Security *
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LC mailing list
>> LC at kantarainitiative.org
>> https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
>>
>> --
>>
>> Kenneth Dagg Independent Consultant Identification and Authentication
>> 613-825-2091 kendaggtbs at gmail.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> LC mailing list
>> LC at kantarainitiative.org
>> https://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/lc/attachments/20181004/72d14c00/attachment.html>


More information about the LC mailing list