[KI-LC] Is Kantara's business model opaque to its members and participants?
john at wunderlich.ca
Sat Apr 29 12:58:05 CDT 2017
It wasn't news to me, although it was articulated concisely and clearly in
a way that I wouldn't have been able to emulate. On the other hand I've
been part of some of those same discussions you allude to.
I suspect that most Kantara members and participants are fairly focussed
individuals and their normal interaction with Kantara is related to their
particular area of expertise or interest, as seen through the lens of their
particular group. So having regular reminders of the roadmap from a Kantara
perspective is a good thing...
John Wunderlich, BA, MBA
IAPP Fellow of Information Privacy
CISA, CIPM, CIPP/C, PbD Ambassador
@PrivacyCDN <https://twitter.com/PrivacyCDN> & Privacist
On 28 April 2017 at 21:11, Colin Wallis <colin at kantarainitiative.org> wrote:
> When I got this response, I was gratified and concerned in about as many
> seconds as it has taken you to read this first sentnece.
> The context, as many of you who are on the BSC DG list know, was about
> completing the Report with a good set of recommendations. (as an aside we
> got some great last minute contributions that exemplifies great cross-group
> I was trying to help Eve and Thomas out by reminding folks of something
> that I thought was fairly obvious...
> And then I get Jeff's response, a guy who has been around Kantara for 5+
> years, and I got to thinking....
> OK, so I have had the benefit of the Board strategy exercise plus multiple
> discussions with many of you, usually aided and abetted by beer :-) to a
> point where it can be articulated reasonably clearly (notwithstanding a
> little bit of license on the formation of the IAWG:-).
> But I have to ask... is there anything I've said below that was news to
> Because if so, that tells me I'll need to articulate it again to the whole
> That's the best description of Kantara I have ever heard (read). I have
> been unclear what the business model was for all these years.
> Thank you.
> Jeff Stollman
> to Susan, Thomas, Eve, dg-bsc
> This is a great discussion folks, keep it going.
> I do want to add tho', that the ultimate 'product' needs to point towards
> something that is operationalizable and monetizable.
> If you stand back and look across Kantara's portfolio, you'll see a kind
> of cadence:
> Brainstorming DGs - to - Spec writing WGs - to - conformance assessment
> Kantara offers the DGs to make it easy to contribute and investigate, size
> and frame up value propositions that industry needs.
> DGs are the 'birds of a feather' that typically draw in first movers and
> thought leaders like you, in order to frame up WGs that bring in a
> community of paying members because that community wants that spec/whatever
> written, to solve a particular problem. And once it is written they
> typically want to formalize that through paid conformance assessment and
> approval, to delineate those who have it and those that don't, in the
> marketplace - for the safety, security and privacy of all users of the
> digital economy.
> That is Kantara's business model.
> Roughly 60% of Kantara's revenue comes from membership, and 40% from the
> Identity Assurance Program. Kantara wants to reverse that metric and in the
> long term, drive down the reliance on membership once a sufficient number
> of monetized programs can carry the overhead costs of the platform.
> The Identity Assurance Program came about because of a need (in that case
> US Federal agencies needing to leverage private sector Identity and
> Credential Service Providers) which in turn brought the CSPs to join
> Kantara, form the Identity Assurance Working Group and to contribute to the
> spec (in that case the Identity Assurance Framework) which in turn became
> the monetized 3rd party assessment and conformance Program, for which
> Kantara is known globally for.
> You can see glimmers of this model surfacing in discussions in the Consent
> & Information Sharing WG about writing conformance criteria for the
> recently balloted Consent Receipt, and in the Identity of Things DG....
> I ask you to spare a thought for this lens through which to view Kantara,
> as you work through these great suggestions.
> Whatever you decide, it doesn't have to be a mirror image of the Identity
> Assurance Program, nor using the synergies of another WG's outputs, tho'
> both are good beacons to be guided by.
> But it does have to be a strong enough value proposition that motivates a
> community to come to Kantara to do their work to solve their problems.
> And the revenue they bring allows Kantara to continue to cover the cost of
> great brainstorming DGs like the BSC DG that kick-starts the cadence of the
> LC mailing list
> LC at kantarainitiative.org
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and
delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient
you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any
action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the LC