[KI-LC] LC Input Requested - Reorg Vision Wiki Page

Rainer Hoerbe rainer at hoerbe.at
Sun Oct 5 04:05:17 CDT 2014



Von meinem iPhone gesendet

> Am 04.10.2014 um 16:31 schrieb Eve Maler <eve at xmlgrrl.com>:
> 
> Joni, this is an amazing analysis, and I love the visualization. A few comments:
> 
> The two themes continue to resonate for me. I'm not sure we need to over-rotate on subthemes. We could "tag" groups however we like under them, I suppose. Certainly it's not worth spending lots and lots of time on groups that are inactive and not likely to activate again.
> That said, I would tend to think that the (inactive) Business Cases for Trusted Federation and Trust Framework Meta Model groups would go under Trust Services if anywhere.
+1

Rainer
> "RAND" is a terrible nickname for an IPR policy whose full name is "Reciprocal Royalty Free with Opt-Out to Reasonable And Non discriminatory (RAND)". Will it freak anyone out? :-)
> Instead of Scope, does it make sense to have two columns, to flag individually whether each group has a Tech aspect and a Policy aspect? Or is that over-rotating?
> 
> FWIW,
> 
> 	Eve
> 
>> On 30 Sep 2014, at 3:25 PM, Joni Brennan <joni at kantarainitiative.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear LC,
>> 
>> Working from Colin's great capture, please find a wiki page posted that attempts to capture the status of the WGs/DGs toward an LC recommendation regarding potential reorganization or affiliations between groups. 
>> - https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/x/RQAxB
>> 
>> This is a key strategic discussion and the Trustees are thankful for the expertise of the LC in the form of a recommendation. Chairs are also welcome to share the page with in their groups for further comment. 
>> 
>> The page is very much a DRAFT.  I'm nearly sure adjustments are needed. LC Members may adjust entries or may request that staff do so. 
>> 
>> I suggest the LC should determine where it proposes: 
>> - specific groups to converge
>> - groups to "affiliate" under themes
>> - both convergence and themes "affiliation"
>> 
>> A cover letter page or some paragraphs to explain the LC view may provide helpful to capture some feedback, for example Iain's note about the "user-driven" perspective. I'm happy to help further regarding LC feedback and comments. 
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> Joni Brennan
>> Kantara Initiative | Executive Director
>> voice:+1 732-266-8994
>> email: joni @ kantarainitiative.org
>> 
>> Connecting Identity for a more trustworthy Internet - Overview
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> LC mailing list
>> LC at kantarainitiative.org
>> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
> 
> 
> Eve Maler                                  http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
> +1 425 345 6756                         http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LC mailing list
> LC at kantarainitiative.org
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/lc/attachments/20141005/cba2043e/attachment.html>


More information about the LC mailing list