[KI-LC] LC Input Requested - Reorg Vision Wiki Page

Joni Brennan joni at kantarainitiative.org
Sat Oct 4 12:39:53 CDT 2014


+1 re RAND needing a better word key... I'll noodle on it. Great feedback

+1 to making tech and policy colums as well. I don't think it's over
rotating at all. Also easy to do

The inactive groups are subject to the shutdown and archiving process,
which I suspect is in the LC next steps.

Thanks Eve!

On Saturday, October 4, 2014, Eve Maler <eve at xmlgrrl.com> wrote:

> Joni, this is an amazing analysis, and I love the visualization. A few
> comments:
>
>
>    - The two themes continue to resonate for me. I'm not sure we need to
>    over-rotate on subthemes. We could "tag" groups however we like under them,
>    I suppose. Certainly it's not worth spending lots and lots of time on
>    groups that are inactive and not likely to activate again.
>    - That said, I would tend to think that the (inactive) Business Cases
>    for Trusted Federation and Trust Framework Meta Model groups would go under
>    Trust Services if anywhere.
>    - "RAND" is a terrible nickname for an IPR policy whose full name is
>    "Reciprocal Royalty Free with Opt-Out to Reasonable And Non discriminatory
>    (RAND)". Will it freak anyone out? :-)
>    - Instead of Scope, does it make sense to have two columns, to flag
>    individually whether each group has a Tech aspect and a Policy aspect? Or
>    is that over-rotating?
>
>
> FWIW,
>
> Eve
>
> On 30 Sep 2014, at 3:25 PM, Joni Brennan <joni at kantarainitiative.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','joni at kantarainitiative.org');>> wrote:
>
> Dear LC,
>
> Working from Colin's great capture, please find a wiki page posted that
> attempts to capture the status of the WGs/DGs toward an LC recommendation
> regarding potential reorganization or affiliations between groups.
> - https://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/x/RQAxB
>
> This is a key strategic discussion and the Trustees are thankful for the
> expertise of the LC in the form of a recommendation. Chairs are also
> welcome to share the page with in their groups for further comment.
>
> *The page is very much a DRAFT. * I'm nearly sure adjustments are needed.
> LC Members may adjust entries or may request that staff do so.
>
> I suggest the LC should determine where it proposes:
> - specific groups to converge
> - groups to "affiliate" under themes
> - both convergence and themes "affiliation"
>
> A cover letter page or some paragraphs to explain the LC view may provide
> helpful to capture some feedback, for example Iain's note about the
> "user-driven" perspective. I'm happy to help further regarding LC feedback
> and comments.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Joni Brennan
> Kantara Initiative | Executive Director
> voice:+1 732-266-8994
> email: joni @ kantarainitiative.org
>
> Connecting Identity for a more trustworthy Internet - Overview
> <http://www.slideshare.net/kantarainitiative/kantara-overview2014-37969351>
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> LC mailing list
> LC at kantarainitiative.org
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','LC at kantarainitiative.org');>
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
>
>
>
> Eve Maler                                  http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog
> +1 425 345 6756                         http://www.twitter.com/xmlgrrl
>
>

-- 
Best Regards,

Joni Brennan
Kantara Initiative | Executive Director
voice:+1 732-266-8994
email: joni @ kantarainitiative.org

Connecting Identity for a more trustworthy Internet - Overview
<http://www.slideshare.net/kantarainitiative/kantara-overview2014-37969351>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/lc/attachments/20141004/372e04d5/attachment.html>


More information about the LC mailing list