[KI-LC] e-vote: Open-Stand.org - modern paradigm for standards

Salvatore D'Agostino sal at idmachines.com
Tue Sep 4 09:36:58 EDT 2012


I don't think I have a vote (dg).

Is this up or down on Open-Stand as is?

I don't like the fact that I think there is a wedge for abusive IP claims
and the overhead of administering them.  

 

Sal

 

 

From: lc-bounces at kantarainitiative.org
[mailto:lc-bounces at kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of Heather Flanagan
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2012 11:41 AM
To: LC at kantarainitiative.org
Subject: [KI-LC] e-vote: Open-Stand.org - modern paradigm for standards

 

Hi all -

As discussed on this week's non-quorate LC call, we're conducting an
e-ballot regarding whether the LC approves of public Kantara Initiative
support for the Open-Stand.org Modern Paradigm for Standards Development.

LC Action: Leadership Council, please AFFIRM or REJECT public Kantara
Initiative support for the Open-Stand.org Modern Paradigm for Standards
Development

___ AFFIRMED

___ REJECTED

Please respond no later than close of business Thursday September 6, 2012.

Thank you for your time!



-------- Original Message -------- 


Subject: 

[KI-LC] Open-Stand.org - modern paradigm for standards


Date: 

Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:51:16 -0700


From: 

Joni Brennan  <mailto:joni at ieee-isto.org> <joni at ieee-isto.org>


To: 

trustees at kantarainitiative.org, LC at kantarainitiative.org



Dear Trustees and LC,

I bring your attention to open-stand.org which summarized as a statement of
principles (http://open-stand.org/principles/) of a modern paradigm for
standards development.  

*	Due process. Decisions are made with equity and fairness among
participants. No one party dominates or guides standards development.
Standards processes are transparent and opportunities exist to appeal
decisions. Processes for periodic standards review and updating are well
defined.
*	Broad consensus. Processes allow for all views to be considered and
addressed, such that agreement can be found across a range of interests.
*	Transparency. Standards organizations provide advance public notice
of proposed standards development activities, the scope of work to be
undertaken, and conditions for participation. Easily accessible records of
decisions and the materials used in reaching those decisions are provided.
Public comment periods are provided before final standards approval and
adoption.
*	Balance. Standards activities are not exclusively dominated by any
particular person, company or interest group.
*	Openness. Standards processes are open to all interested and
informed parties.

As an agenda item I'd like to ask both the Trustees and LC to discuss the
OpenStand and to consider Kantara support
(http://open-stand.org/stand-with-us/) for this movement.  This is not a
monetary commitment but a statement of support for the principles. While
Kantara Initiative is not a Standards body, organizations like Kantara,
industry groups, user groups ,ect depend upon the consensus based and
transparent development of open standards.  

Please consider the above at each groups earliest opportunity. 

Best Regards,
=Joni

Joni Brennan
Kantara Initiative | Executive Director
voice:+1 732-226-4223
email: joni @ ieee-isto.org

Slideshare - Building Trusted Identity Ecosystems - It takes a village! 
http://www.slideshare.net/kantarainitiative/kantara-may-2012







 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/lc/attachments/20120904/dd2b6171/attachment-0001.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6085 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/lc/attachments/20120904/dd2b6171/attachment-0001.bin 


More information about the LC mailing list