[KI-LC] Please be sure to attend the LC Call this Wednesday - IAWG approved Additional Criteria

Anna Ticktin atick10 at me.com
Tue Jan 31 23:33:42 EST 2012


Thanks Bob.  (And thanks to you, too, Colin for your remarks earlier....)
I've started a record of comments received and look forward to continued LC discussion on tomorrow's call.

Best.
—> Anna Ticktin

       anna at kantarainitiative.org
       anna at ieee-isto.org

On 31Jan2012, at 8:21 PM, Bob Pinheiro wrote:

> My comments:
> 
> Line 5:  Should it be "US Federal Privacy Profile"?
> 
> The first sentence in the Abstract (lines 17 - 19) is confusing and not grammatically correct.  [This sentence is also repeated in lines 57 - 59.] Perhaps this sentence could be changed to "This document specifies additional criteria for CSPs that desire certification under the IAF for interoperation with US Federal Agency applications under the Open Government program."
> 
> Line 25 refers to an Applicant Identity Provider, and line 109 to an Identity Provider.   For consistency throughout, should these be changed to "CSP"?
> 
> Line 26 - 27 refers to "US Federal Government Privacy Additional Criteria of the Identity Assurance Framework."  Is this the correct name of the document?
> 
> The link given in line 30 appears to be broken.
> 
> Line 61: Change "This additional criteria is" to "These additional criteria are..."
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> On 1/30/2012 9:46 PM, Palmer, Pete wrote:
>> 
>> Hi LC Members,
>>  
>> Please be sure to attend this week’s LC call.  It is also important that you review the attached document.  ICAM is anxiously awaiting this document (see Anna’s note below). Thanks!
>>  
>> -Pete
>>  
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>> 
>> From: Anna Ticktin <annaticktin at me.com>
>> Date: 26January2012 11:21:42 AM PST
>> To: LC <lc at kantarainitiative.org>
>> Cc: Lara Zimberoff <lara.zimberoff at apenimed.com>
>> Subject: IAWG approved Additional Criteria:
>>  
>> Hello there-
>>  
>> Attached is the final approved version of IAWG's Additional Criteria: US Federal Privacy Profile v2.0. 
>>  
>> (This is virtually the same document that had been put forth a few times over the fall for LC ratification as a recommendation, but it was sent back to the IAWG do be "re-versioned" and downgraded to report status.) 
>>  
>> As this profile is eagerly anticipated by our friends at ICAM, we ask that LC members please review this brief document and come prepared to either further discuss or approve it on next week's call, 1 Feb 2012. With that, I hope that all voting members will be able to dial-in and address this as a priority on the agenda.
>>  
>>  
>> Many thanks for your assistance. 
>> We look forward to having you on the call next Wednesday!
>>  
>>  
>> Regards.
>> —> Anna Ticktin
>> 
>>        anna at kantarainitiative.org
>>        anna at ieee-isto.org
>>  
>> --
>> Pete Palmer | Director, Information Security | Surescripts
>> O: 651.855.3034 | C: 612.598.4444 |pete.palmer at surescripts.com
>>  
>> This e-mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain sensitive information, and are intended solely for the individual to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail immediately and destroy all copies of the e-mail and any attachments.
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> LC mailing list
>> LC at kantarainitiative.org
>> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
>   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LC mailing list
> LC at kantarainitiative.org
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/lc/attachments/20120131/47d13755/attachment-0001.html 


More information about the LC mailing list