[KI-LC] UDVPI-WG Supplemental Budget Request
Colin.Wallis at dia.govt.nz
Tue Sep 8 16:21:18 PDT 2009
..so to that point, eGov's interest is two-fold:
1) More generally, there is a gap between where W3C WCAG 2.0 stops (accessibility etc) and 'UX' starts. There are rumours of a kind of convergence between ISO 13407 and ISO 9241-210 which will give direction, but will stop way short of design/deployment guidelines. So governments that want to comply with ISO standards (50 odd nations are P (voting members of ISO so they have little choice!) want a consistent approach to doing that.
2) More specifically, because the US GSA is progressing with the use of alternative protocols and expects to produce a deployment profile for use of these with US gov websites. Clearly this research would inform that profile. Then, after a successful pilot, the eGov group plans to internationalise that US GSA profile by melding it in with requirements from other jurisdictions, in the way done with the Liberty eGov profile for web SSO OASIS SAML 2.0.
From: lc-bounces at kantarainitiative.org [mailto:lc-bounces at kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of J. Trent Adams
Sent: Wednesday, 9 September 2009 11:03 a.m.
To: Iain Henderson
Cc: LC at kantarainitiative.org
Subject: Re: [KI-LC] UDVPI-WG Supplemental Budget Request
Can you tackle a paragraph that addresses Ken's point?
I believe you have more than enough expressed interest from other WGs to
satisfy his comment, but it'll probably need to be more clearly articulated.
If so, do you think you can get this done quickly enough to keep it on
the voting track for tomorrow?
Salzberg, Kenneth M wrote:
> In reading the proposal, there is one thing that stands out as a potential issue for me.
> In the Exec Summary the following statement is made:
> "The ultimate aim is to produce a statistically valid body or research available to
> consortia partners that will enable product/ service design for those wishing to deploy
> and engage with user-centric/ user-driven identities."
> In the Kanatara benefit section it states:
> "This project seeks to build and enable genuine thought leadership across technology,
> business model, regulatory and user experience in the digital identity realm."
> The issue I have is that I question the use of Kantara funds to drive development of member products and services, which does not seem appropriate to me. This could certainly be a side benefit, but not the direct purpose.
> I agree that the thought leadership is a worthy goal, but is a bit weak on its own.
> What I would like to see is something that shows how this research will help drive/market work being done in one or more WGs.
> Ken Salzberg, Technology Manager
> Integrated Platforms Research, Intel Labs
> ken.salzberg at intel.com 503.264.8276 JF2-58
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lc-bounces at kantarainitiative.org [mailto:lc-bounces at kantarainitiative.org] On Behalf Of J. Trent Adams
> Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 2:27 PM
> To: LC at kantarainitiative.org
> Subject: Re: [KI-LC] UDVPI-WG Supplemental Budget Request
> All -
> I would like to ask everyone to make an attempt to attend tomorrow's
> scheduled Leadership Council teleconference in order to achieve quorum.
> During the call I would like to see if we can approve the supplemental
> budget request that was put on the table last week by the UDVPI-WG.
> I assume that everyone has had a chance to ask the necessary questions
> during the past week, and it's important to try and close this out so
> the work can begin.
> Thanks in advance,
> J. Trent Adams wrote:
>> All -
>> As you saw in the agenda for tomorrow's LC teleconference, Iain has
>> submitted a Supplemental Budget Request for 2009 on behalf of the UDVPI-WG:
>> This request is to help fund the preliminary phase of a proposed
>> research project with the ultimate goal being to:
>> "produce a statistically valid body or research
>> available to consortia partners that will enable
>> product / service design for those wishing to
>> deploy and engage with user-centric / user-
>> driven identities."
>> ISOC has independently allocated US$4,000 to help fund this initial
>> phase, and the request is for an additional US$5,000 from Kantara.
>> The following KI WGs have already expressed interest in the work:
>> * Privacy & Public Policy
>> * User Managed Access
>> * eGov
>> * Consumer Identity
>> Unfortunately, Iain will not be able to attend the call tomorrow, so it
>> would help if you could review the document in advance and send him (or
>> reply to the list) with any immediate questions. We can pick up the
>> discussion on the call and see what we need to do from there, knowing
>> that any questions requiring Iain will need to be deferred.
> J. Trent Adams
> Outreach Specialist, Trust & Identity
> Internet Society
> e) adams at isoc.org
> o) 703-439-2149
> LC mailing list
> LC at kantarainitiative.org
J. Trent Adams
Outreach Specialist, Trust & Identity
e) adams at isoc.org
LC mailing list
LC at kantarainitiative.org
CAUTION: This email message and any attachments contain information that may be confidential and may be LEGALLY PRIVILEGED. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this message or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email message in error please notify us immediately and erase all copies of the message and attachments. Thank you.
More information about the LC