[KI-LC] Call for Votes: InfoSharing WG Charter Change

Eve Maler eve at xmlgrrl.com
Fri Oct 23 09:45:44 EDT 2009


YES. (I think the other changes are merely editorial and could be made  
silently.)

On 22 Oct 2009, at 3:08 PM, J. Trent Adams wrote:

>
> All -
>
> This is a call for you to vote on the following motion.  Please reply
> according to the options listed below.
>
> MOTION: To update the charter of the Information Sharing Work Group
> (InfoSharing WG) to address the incorporation of the previously  
> proposed
> User Driven Volunteered Personal Information Policy Work Group  
> (UDVPI -
> Policy WG).
>
> Specifically, to replace the following text within Section 5 of the
> InfoSharing WG charter [1]:
>
> -----
> (5) OTHER DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: Other Draft
>     Recommendations and projected completion dates for
>     submission for All Member Ballot.
>
>     Note: These recommendation are likely to be delivered via
>     a separate/ related working group as the intellectual property
>     requirements of the above differ from the technical specification
>     work.
>
>     See User Driven Volunteered Personal Information Policy
>     Working Group
> -----
>
> With the following:
>
> -----
> (5) OTHER DRAFT RECOMMENDATIONS: Other Draft
>     Recommendations and projected completion dates for
>     submission for All Member Ballot.
>
>     * A clear description and definition of User Driven
>        Information
>     * Use cases illustrating deployment of User Driven
>        Information across a wide range of scenario's
>     * A standardized approach to a data sharing agreement as
>        driven from the individual perspective
>     * Deployment guidelines
>     * Trust-marks, Audit and Compliance mechanisms
>     * Qualitative and quantitative market research amongst
>        individuals on the factors that will dictate uptake of
>        Volunteered Personal Information (VPI) sharing (subject
>        to funding)
>     * Qualitative and quantitative market research amongst
>        organisations on the factors that will dictate uptake of
>        VPI sharing (beginning with Kantara Initiative member
>        base)
> -----
>
>
> Your options:
>
> A. Reply with any discussion on this motion prior to voting.
>
> B. Reply to this message with a "YES" if you support this change.
>
> C. Reply to this message with a "NO" if you do not support this
>      change. Also, please include your rationale for a "NO" vote.
>
> D. Reply to this message with an "ABSTAIN" if you abstain.
>
> The deadline for voting is Thursday, October 29th at 23:59 UTC.
>
> This vote requires a Simple Majority to pass (i.e. more than 50% of
> votes received - excluding abstentions).
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Trent
>
>
> [1] http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/x/JwAj
>
>
> -- 
> J. Trent Adams
> =jtrentadams
>
> Outreach Specialist, Trust & Identity
> Internet Society
> http://www.isoc.org
>
> e) adams at isoc.org
> o) 703-439-2149
>
> _______________________________________________
> LC mailing list
> LC at kantarainitiative.org
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc


Eve Maler
eve at xmlgrrl.com
http://www.xmlgrrl.com/blog



More information about the LC mailing list