[KI-LC] [BoT] Proposed Change to the Intellectual Property Rights Policy
joni at ieee-isto.org
Tue Nov 17 16:33:31 EST 2009
I'm a fan of this page -
It's simple graphical treatment and columns give a good snapshot of
the attributes of each license type.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Brett McDowell <email at brettmcdowell.com> wrote:
> Do you mean something like this:
> Brett McDowell | http://info.brettmcdowell.com | http://KantaraInitiative.org
> On Nov 17, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Robin Wilton wrote:
>> One argument in favour of the CC licensing option was, IIRC, the fact that there is a place you can link to which gives a standardised definition of what the particular CC license implies. Is there an equivalent mechanism we can adopt for the other two options, so that in each case there is a simple way for non-sepcialists to check what each option means?
>> That comment made, I concur with Eve's recommendation.
>> Eve Maler wrote:
>>> Personally, I think we should go ahead on #1. And we should see if we can convince Bill Smith to round up some (joint BoT/LC?) committee activity on #2. :-)
>>> On 17 Nov 2009, at 10:21 AM, J. Trent Adams wrote:
>> LC mailing list
>> LC at kantarainitiative.org
> LC mailing list
> LC at kantarainitiative.org
Director of Technology Programs
email: joni @ ieee-isto.org
Join the conversation on the community@ list -
More information about the LC