[KI-LC] [BoT] Proposed Change to the Intellectual Property Rights Policy

Joni Brennan joni at ieee-isto.org
Tue Nov 17 16:33:31 EST 2009


I'm a fan of this page -

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/

It's simple graphical treatment and columns give a good snapshot of
the attributes of each license type.

On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:28 PM, Brett McDowell <email at brettmcdowell.com> wrote:
> Do you mean something like this:
>
> http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
>
>
>
> Brett McDowell  |  http://info.brettmcdowell.com  |  http://KantaraInitiative.org
>
> On Nov 17, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Robin Wilton wrote:
>
>> One argument in favour of the CC licensing option was, IIRC, the fact that there is a place you can link to which gives a standardised definition of what the particular CC license implies. Is there an equivalent mechanism we can adopt for the other two options, so that in each case there is a simple way for non-sepcialists to check what each option means?
>>
>> That comment made, I concur with Eve's recommendation.
>>
>> Yrs.,
>> Robin
>>
>> Eve Maler wrote:
>>> Personally, I think we should go ahead on #1.  And we should see if we can convince Bill Smith to round up some (joint BoT/LC?) committee activity on #2. :-)
>>>
>>>      Eve
>>>
>>> On 17 Nov 2009, at 10:21 AM, J. Trent Adams wrote:
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> LC mailing list
>> LC at kantarainitiative.org
>> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
>
> _______________________________________________
> LC mailing list
> LC at kantarainitiative.org
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc
>



-- 
Joni Brennan
IEEE-ISTO
Kantara Initiative
Director of Technology Programs
voice:+1 732-226-4223
email: joni @ ieee-isto.org
gtalk: jonibrennan

Join the conversation on the community@ list -
http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/community


More information about the LC mailing list