[KI-LC] [BoT] Proposed Change to the Intellectual Property Rights Policy

Brett McDowell email at brettmcdowell.com
Tue Nov 17 16:28:53 EST 2009


Do you mean something like this:

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/



Brett McDowell  |  http://info.brettmcdowell.com  |  http://KantaraInitiative.org

On Nov 17, 2009, at 3:09 PM, Robin Wilton wrote:

> One argument in favour of the CC licensing option was, IIRC, the fact that there is a place you can link to which gives a standardised definition of what the particular CC license implies. Is there an equivalent mechanism we can adopt for the other two options, so that in each case there is a simple way for non-sepcialists to check what each option means?
> 
> That comment made, I concur with Eve's recommendation.
> 
> Yrs.,
> Robin
> 
> Eve Maler wrote:
>> Personally, I think we should go ahead on #1.  And we should see if we can convince Bill Smith to round up some (joint BoT/LC?) committee activity on #2. :-)
>> 
>> 	Eve
>> 
>> On 17 Nov 2009, at 10:21 AM, J. Trent Adams wrote:
>>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> LC mailing list
> LC at kantarainitiative.org
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/lc



More information about the LC mailing list