[KI-LC] [BoT] Proposed Change to the Intellectual Property Rights Policy

Robin Wilton futureidentity at fastmail.fm
Tue Nov 17 15:09:47 EST 2009


One argument in favour of the CC licensing option was, IIRC, the fact 
that there is a place you can link to which gives a standardised 
definition of what the particular CC license implies. Is there an 
equivalent mechanism we can adopt for the other two options, so that in 
each case there is a simple way for non-sepcialists to check what each 
option means?

That comment made, I concur with Eve's recommendation.

Yrs.,
Robin

Eve Maler wrote:
> Personally, I think we should go ahead on #1.  And we should see if we can convince Bill Smith to round up some (joint BoT/LC?) committee activity on #2. :-)
>
> 	Eve
>
> On 17 Nov 2009, at 10:21 AM, J. Trent Adams wrote:
>   

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3388 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/lc/attachments/20091117/fa314407/attachment.bin 


More information about the LC mailing list