[DG-BSC] Please read and respond ASAP if you're mentioned: Meetings and section assignments this week, and how to fill in sections

mat perugini mat.perugini at gmail.com
Mon Oct 10 14:57:07 CDT 2016


Hallo everyone,

I'm in, with the timetable we have agreed.

Best regards

Matisse

Il 10/ott/2016 18:05, "Eve Maler" <eve.maler at forgerock.com> ha scritto:

> Both Thomas and I are *unable to attend/run* the meetings this week. We
> have a couple of options: a) If there is new section content to review, we
> could seek a chair pro tem (*Scott S?*) for that purpose, or b) if there
> isn't, we probably shouldn't meet.
>
> The current assignments are as follows. You can find most of them in the
> Report
> <http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/BSC/Report+from+the+Blockchain+and+Smart+Contracts+Discussion+Group>
> itself. *Can people please speak up TODAY about when they can complete
> first drafts*, and we'll make a judgment call ASAP about tomorrow's call?
>
>    - IPFS: *Thomas*
>    - Certificate Transparency: *Scott S* (already some content there)
>    - CommonAccord: *Jim H*
>    - Protocol-Specific Contract Provisions:
>       - *Kathleen* for HL7 piece
>       - *Eve* for UMA model text piece
>    - Legal contracts: *Scott D*
>    - Digital Identity: *Andrew*
>    - UMA: *Eve*
>    - Consent Receipts: *John W*
>    - User-Submitted Terms: *John W* or designee
>    - Case Study: MedRec: *Kathleen*
>    - Case Study: Blood Diamond: *Matisse+Scott S*
>    - Case Study: Sovrin: *Eve*
>
> For case studies, we said we'd use a questionnaire approach something like
> this:
>
>    - Deficits and benefits of how the problem space was/is being solved
>    - Proposed benefits of the new solution space – crystalize this (e.g.,
>    fraud, not "user empowerment"?)
>    - Different approaches being taken (e.g., whitelist? blacklist?
>    other?) in the new solution space
>    - Strengths, weaknesses, risks, and open issues being seen in practice
>    - Cross-references to the appropriate other technology, case study,
>    and use case sections
>    - Since our Report process is time-boxed, go into only as much depth
>    as you can in a short period of time
>
> For *use cases*, we already have a template
> <http://kantarainitiative.org/confluence/display/BSC/Use+Case+Template>
> in use; I feel it may benefit from *enhancement* with points from the
> above.
>
> For *technology/technique sections*, we said we'd like to see this
> information:
>
>    - A definition
>    - A short discussion of strengths and weakness of the current way of
>    doing things
>    - A short comparative discussion of strengths and weakness of the new
>    way of doing things (if the technology/technique is "new")
>    - Pointers to the other technology and technique sections as
>    appropriate (so that we have cross-references among the sections)
>
>
> *Eve Maler*ForgeRock Office of the CTO | VP Innovation & Emerging
> Technology
> Cell +1 425.345.6756 | Skype: xmlgrrl | Twitter: @xmlgrrl
> *ForgeRock Summits* are coming to <http://summits.forgerock.com/> *London
> and Paris!*
>
> _______________________________________________
> DG-BSC mailing list
> DG-BSC at kantarainitiative.org
> http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/dg-bsc
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/dg-bsc/attachments/20161010/06cf1b8b/attachment.html>


More information about the DG-BSC mailing list