[DG-BSC] Blockstack identity services

Patrick Curry patrick.curry at bbfa.info
Thu Aug 4 05:09:00 CDT 2016


Hi James, 

Interesting.  Good discussion, thanks.  I offer a few comments.

Block chain refers to a specific, defined technology.  Blockchain is a trademark.

Do we mean solutions or requirements?  Are the solutions technology specific or general solutions to a business problem, where a block chain may feature as part of the solution set?

If we replace Proof of Work with PKI Federation, which is attractive & desirable in many situations, do we still have a block chain?  My block chain colleagues believe that we still do, and there is an ongoing discussion about how PoW might be measured to achieve some sort of LoA that could map, in policy terms, to PKI and create a basis for for BC - PKI federation.  

The voting process presents several complexities, some of which could be addressed by an underlying trust fabric.  There hasn’t been much discussion about this yet, but it will definitely be moving there later this year as the UK government has just approved its first BC provider to be listed in a catalogue service available to all UK gov organisations.

A feature of BCs being used in regulated settings is that the regulator (regulators in many cases, particularly internationally) requires to have a voting node and so gets to see all traffic.  Regulators haven’t woken up to this yet, but I am expecting to see them require the development of rulesets that are embedded in the process in the BC with decision authority (signature), i.e. a smart contract.   I don’t understand why this would be a bug. A feature or a factor, yes.

Ref data management, the smart contract is a feature of permissioned block chains because of how the cryptography works. It’s hard to see how this functionality could be replicated easily in other existing technologies.  Instead, what is beginning to happen is that companies link their ERP etc to the block chain.  The ERP provides the internal business functionality and logic, the block chain DLT provides the external interoperability & contract integrity. The smart contract runs on the chain, not on in the enterprise app.  This satisfies the supply chain requirements where a centralised enterprise solution would/does not.

Agree about data replication.  Depending on the nature of the business requirement and use cases, data minimisation is one of the privacy principles.  Proofs of concept on some Zero Knowledge Proof mechanisms have been completed and a couple are moving to bigger pilots.  ZKP and other anonymised attribute assurance mechanisms are attractive and suitable options for block chain privacy requirements.

Interesting that you mention Zittrain.  His work on trusted intermediaries has come up in international discussions of lead industries, law enforcement and govs, as a way to address policy collisions on public safety and privacy.  The discussions are more about encryption and key management; block chains haven’t yet been discussed, but they might be.   I agree about JSON.  I’d be interested in knowing more about your and Eve’s work in this area.  is there anything you can share?

regards,

Patrick

Patrick Curry
Director

British Business Federation Authority - BBFA Ltd
M: +44 786 024 9074
T:   +44 1980 620606
patrick.curry at bbfa.info
www.bbfa.info – a not-for-profit, self-regulating body   



On 3 Aug 2016, at 15:08, James Hazard <james.g.hazard at gmail.com> wrote:

Though "Blockchain" is in the title of this discussion group, it need not be in all of the solutions.  "Blockchains" have large privacy and data security challenges built into maintaining consensus on the state of the ledger (database).  Most real life situations have available a range of alternative means of validating the state of the ledger.  For instance, a regulator.

So, we might view it as a bug, rather than a feature, if a "smart contract" solution requires execution on a blockchain.  

Organizations and humans will want to be able to efficiently manage large numbers of ledger entries, in efficient databases (SQL, graph, IPFS), not blockchains.  They will need to be able to run the smart contracts on those other platforms.  

Data replication should be minimized, and temporary to the extent possible.  This will, I think, also be required by GDPR.

The necessary point of agreement, the waist of the Zittrain hourglass, is very small - a format for ledger entries.  CommonAccord asserts (I assert on its behalf) that the key to this is ... key/values, a way of resolving references, and inheritance.  For good reasons, JSON is a likely to be the most common "punctuation" (Eve's word) for exchange of ledger entries.  Our current rendering engine uses plain text and carriage returns.  That is the lightest "punctuation" and may be the best for collaboration on big texts, notably for collaboration among lawyers and regulators on Github.  It closely parallels the presentation of software source code.  But this barely matters.  What matters is a common approach to linking and inheritance.
 
 


 



  

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 6:53 AM, John Wunderlich <john at wunderlich.ca <mailto:john at wunderlich.ca>> wrote:
Domenico;

As soon as the use case makes Alice's role that of a "Citizen" a whole raft of non-technical issues arise that should be addressed. How do you implement privacy protection into the architecture to avoid abuse by authoritarian regimes? If I think of all the cases where I'm asked to present government issued ID as proof of identity, and then ask, "Would it be a good thing if there was an permanent audit trail available to the government (any state agency) of all those interactions?"

I would restate your problem definition to see if we can design a wide identity ecosystem use case for managing citizen identities that enables (or better, only works if) citizens control their own identities. 

(PS, see my signature block below, apropos of this issue)

John Wunderlich,

Sent frum a mobile device,
Pleez 4give speling erurz

"...a world of near-total surveillance and endless record-keeping is likely to be one with less liberty, less experimentation, and certainly far less joy..." A. Michael Froomkin

_____________________________
From: Domenico Catalano <domenico.catalano at oracle.com <mailto:domenico.catalano at oracle.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 4:47 AM
Subject: [DG-BSC] Blockstack identity services
To: <dg-bsc at kantarainitiative.org <mailto:dg-bsc at kantarainitiative.org>>


Hi all,

maybe, you already know blockstack id technology for identity services, at blockstack.org <https://blockstack.org/docs/how-blockstack-works> 

I think it’s quite useful for investigation and for defining use cases.

I was wondering whether we can provide a wide identity ecosystem use case for managing citizen identities.

Consider the following high level use case:

- The Citizen is identified by a Blockchain-ready Registry. 
- The Citizen requests to register with the Registry through a specific mobile app, which provides the necessary cryptographic key pairs with which the request is signed.
- The Registry includes the request in the blockchain which is distributed among the nodes, as smart contract.
- The mobile app and the cryptographic keys are now able to provides strong authentication mechanisms for citizen online access.

Citizen Identity can be enriched through the blockchain nodes (special nodes) interactions which provide attribute/profile attestation.

I hope it’s useful for further discussions.

Thanks
Domenico





This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. If you are not the intended recipient you are notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.

_______________________________________________
DG-BSC mailing list
DG-BSC at kantarainitiative.org <mailto:DG-BSC at kantarainitiative.org>
http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/dg-bsc <http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/dg-bsc>




-- 
@commonaccord
_______________________________________________
DG-BSC mailing list
DG-BSC at kantarainitiative.org
http://kantarainitiative.org/mailman/listinfo/dg-bsc

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kantarainitiative.org/pipermail/dg-bsc/attachments/20160804/65897f4f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the DG-BSC mailing list