Date
2018-10-17
Status of Minutes
DRAFT
Approved at: <<Insert link to minutes showing approval>>
Agenda
- Call to order
- Roll Call & Determination of quorum status
- Agenda bashing
- Kantara Organization updates
- WG Motions
- Discussion
- Upcoming conferences and events
- All Other Business (AOB)
- Adjourn
Attendees
Voting
- Corné van Rooij
- Jim Pasquale
- Andrew Hughes
Non-Voting
- David Turner
- Chris Olsen
- Sal D'Agostino
Regrets
Quorum Status
Meeting was <<<>>> quorate
Voting participants
Participant roster (CMS) - Quorum is 4 of 6 as of 2018-04-02
(Voting status: Corné van Rooij, Jim Pasquale, Andrew Hughes, Tony Fish, Pushpalanka Jayawardhana, John Wunderlich)
Discussion Items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|
| 5 min | - Call to order
- Roll call
- Agenda bashing
- Organization updates
| Chair |
|
| 5 min | WG Motions
Quorum required | Chair | Moved by: Seconded: Discussion: Result:
|
| 5 min | Introductions | All | Welcome! |
| 10 min | Update on W3C workshop on User Consent and Permissions September 26, 2018 | Andrew | https://www.w3.org/Privacy/permissions-ws-2018/schedule.html
|
| FYI | Discussion on document drafting | All | The draft is in a Google doc - feel free to comment - Chairs and Editor will control acceptance of material. - Set a deadline for our work - EIC Munich in May
- Need to refocus on working in small teams on specific subjects
- Corné will start with 2 streams: BP-1 (Consent Definition) and BP-2 (Privacy Notice)
- Looking for writing partners to build content
- Other streams:
- CR-1 Existing Regulations
- BP-3 (Consent Need) is an active area for discussion
- ACTION: Corné to send a notice to the WG to ask for colloboration assignments
- We need to ensure that we collaborate with the Consent & Information Sharing WG - they discuss similar/same topics
Discussion about the draft Introduction (Jim): - The document should be "instructions" for organzations who want to do the "right" thing in relation to consent management ("What to do")
- The document also should make the case for why "right" consent management is a good idea and beneficial for organizations and people. ("Why do it")
- Not only for regulatory compliance - there are reasons to do this the "right" way that benefit people and organizations
- Need to touch on lifecycle and supply chain aspects of data management
|
| FYI | Discussion on the Interview Questions | All | The first draft of the interview questions is in a Google doc - please comment. |
| 5 min | Upcoming conferences and events | Andrew | Events that Kantara will have an active role: https://kantarainitiative.org/events/ - Kuppinger Cole CIAM World Tour Seattle & Amsterdam
- IIW 2018B
|
| 5 min | AOB | Chair |
|
| Adjourn | Chair | Next WG meeting Wednesday, October 3, 2018 10:00 Eastern Daylight Time / 15:00 BST |
From 2018-09-05 meeting:
https://martechtoday.com/two-french-location-data-companies-receive-gdpr-consent-warnings-223467
https://www.dandodiary.com/2018/08/articles/securities-litigation/investors-filed-gdpr-related-securities-suit-nielsen-holdings/
- Idea: Blog post on "What happened to Consent?"
- Differences between authorization, permissions and consent
- Shareholder lawsuit coming up re impacts of GDPR to bottom line
- Need to treat 'Consent' as a Product & do product management approaches to grow the market
- Setup for podcasts or Brighttalk summits
- Consentua is in the Gartner hype cycle map for 2018
- Gartner positions this in their Integrated Risk Management sphere
- Question is: how can you use this new dataset called "Consent Receipt" how can the company make more money/satisfy the customer
- Is the killer app around interoperability of the receipt records? or portability of the records themselves? how does this play out on the platform?
- How does consent record/receipt work in a long term customer management scenario (possibly this is consent practices)
- How does this play out with respect to industry associations code of conduct? (possibly consent receipt)