Child pages
  • 2017-05-18 Draft Meeting Notes
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

Attendees

Discussion Items

ItemNotes
MoU and next steps

Annex B table 1

Interop 2 3 4 for LoA 4 was partially confirmed. KI also confirmed for Interop 2, 3 and 4. Partial a for LoA4 and not for LoA 2 and 3 when there is no credit

Cover Privacy 13 requires specific privacy assessment, there was no credit and was confirmed by KI.

 

There are not changes on the KI US federal privacy mapping

Table and annex C relates to the Table 1 of Annex B.

 

Need to explain table in annex C:

Shows the first table 3, shows the baseline for the IDEF that has been mapped as full conformance or partial for full service CSPs. Also approves components provides the identity proofing component or the credential management component not all the baseline requirements because not all the 1400 are assessed for those components.

Table 4

Privacy requirements certified there is not differentiation for full service or component, assessed against all the pre-qualifications for the IDEF baseline requirements apply.

 

Table 5. this shows the baseline requirements for ID proofing component and baseline requirements that are mapped and satisfied for id proofing component that are approved just for the component function.

 

Table 6 Table 6: IDEF Registry Prequalification for IDEF Baseline Requirements for Kantara-approved Credential Management Component Service Providers

 

For full service or components are not pre-qualified for specific baseline requirements, they were determined not comparable requirements, not equivalent, no applicable, , those are not shown in the table

 

So the table only shows those baselines requirements that the 3 types of approvals are pre-qualified for, full service CSPs, identity and verification components and credential management service components.

 

  • David and Ben offered to help presenting the MoU in June´s KI BoD meeting (June 15th). David pointed out that they would like to jointly draft the communications to the KI CSPs that will contain the MoU.
  • Colin may be able to present KI views on the IDESG Board Meeting.
  • David and Ben will send the clean version to the IDESG Board for their consideration. Ben will ask the Board to designate the person that will be the IDESG contact in the MoU.
  • The MoU needs IDESG legal review for the sign off.
  •  
  • No labels