Child pages
  • Entity Naming Conventions
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Current »

This is to capture issues and requirements around the naming of entities across federations.

  • Federations accepting certifications from 3rd parties
    • If a Federation publishes a LoA claim in its meta-data based on one or more 3rd party assurances eg Kantara LoA 2 IAF + OSIS ICAM LoA 2 Infocard profile, how do the various parties assured that they are referring to the same Entity so that the meta-data can be produced in an automated way.
  • Entities belonging to multiple federations publishing meta-data
    • A entity may need to choose different entityID for each federation they belong to if RP/SP are importing meta-data from multiple sources eg OIX, InCommon, and Kantara. This creates a issue for the RP/SP as a user coming from the same IdP will appear to be a different user depending on what trust Framework LoA the RP/SP was requiring. This happens when different Federations are certifying different trust frameworks and a given IdP belongs to multiple federations to get certified.
  • No labels