Status of Minutes
Approved at: 2019-12-12 Meeting notes (CR) DRAFT
- Jim Pasquale
- Lisa LeVasseur
- Mary Hodder
- Iain Henderson
- Yusef Khan
- Colin Wallis
- Tom Jones
- Vitor Jesus
- James Aschberger
- Andrew Hughes
- Mark Lizar
Meeting was not quorate
Participant Roster (2016) - As of 2019-05-15 quorum is 6 of 11
(Voting participants are: Iain Henderson, Mary Hodder, Mark Lizar, Jim Pasquale (C), John Wunderlich (VC), Andrew Hughes (VC), Oscar Santolalla, Richard Gomer, Paul Knowles, Lisa LeVasseur, James Aschberger, Yusef Khan)
- Please remember to update your entry on the Consent Receipts Implementations Page - this is a major landing point for external viewers and raises awareness of the CIS WG work and your product too
- During the course of the meeting to take sparse notes, noting these key things:
a. Open Critical Question
b. New Action items and owners
c. Key Agreements by the team
d. Answers to Critical Questions (if none when? assign a deadline)
- Update on Charter refresh work Review doc in draft
- Discuss next steps for receipt specification
|2 mins||Motion to approve prior minutes||Not quorate|
MOTION: To approve all and any outstanding meeting minutes requiring approval.
Please review these blogs offline for current status on Kantara and all the DG/WG:
There is a wiki page that will hold all the known implementations of Consent Receipts - Please update the page or inform Jim, or John, or Andrew of your implementation.
- Suggestion: Make one CISWG meeting per month dedicated to Demos plus updates from other related standards work
- Waiting for some recommendations
- Andrew gave an update on the ISO standardization push
- No response from Jim's request to the group LCs on meeting (online) to review top level questions from the WG on processes and procedures moving Information Sharing foward.
- Jim's asked everyone on the call to send out a group message asking those voting members to join next weeks' call to ratifiy the pervious CIS meeting notes, as there are many needing to be memorized. Jim will do the same as a house keeping issue
|0 min||News about new implementations||All|
|0 min||Processing feature requests for v.next specification work|
- Rengaged work Being done on GitHub, do we stay with it and multtle through the learning curve, or go back to Confluence (here), This is a big questions the group needs to answer.
- What are the top level Catogories
- How will they be define: ie Bugs/Enhancments/New Specs
- Tom Jones & Vitor know of some predefined lists and would look at them
| min||News and Happenings||Jim|
The MyData Movement has requested a 20 minute presentation on CR on thier 12/13 Webinar
- Jim will present and Andrew has provided the slide he did in Sept.
|0 min||Demo status update||all|
Recording from Identiverse is now available - link to come soon (might only be available to conference attendees - will request a YouTube version from the organizers).
|0 min||Specification update approach|
See a flowchart version of this here:
|45 min||WG Charter Refresh||Jim|
- Submitting to Andrew Hughes
Upcoming events update
- Jim: Suggested a short training on how to correctly use Git-Hub
- Comments: each toolset has challenges
- Probably move towards using Confluence with document attachments
- Best path forward administratively would be to start a new WG using the current updated charter. Then move to archive this current WG. This would cause a clean-up of stale participant lists and allow us to change to the simpler "Non-assert covenant" IPR option.
*** Next call 2019-11-21 10:30 am Eastern DAYLIGHT Time
- MOTION: To adjourn
- Discussion: None
- Motion carried