Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

2017-0910-2812

Status of Minutes

DRAFT

Approved at: <<Insert link to minutes showing approval>>

Attendees

Voting


Non-Voting

Regrets
  • David Turner

...

Info
titleQuorum Status
Meeting was << status>>

...

Info
titleVoting participants

Participant Roster (2016) - Quorum is 5 of 8 as of 2017-08-24

Iain Henderson, Mary Hodder, Harri Honko, MarkLizar, Jim Pasquale, John Wunderlich, Andrew Hughes, Rupert Graves

Discussion Items

TimeItemWhoNotes
4 mins
  • Roll call
  • Agenda bashing
  •  
1 min
  • Organization updates
All

Please review these blogs offline for current status on Kantara and all the DG/WG:


5 minDiscuss 'sprint' process diagram
David
All

 What is left to do for v1.1?

  • Sprint
5 resolution - issues will be closed - the Appendix listing examples will be moved into a different document/wikiSprint
  • 6
    • The remaining issues
    • Looking to the end of October for completion of a stable draft



10 minDiscuss work backlog priorities for CR v1.1David not present

Github Issues: https://github.com/KantaraInitiative/CISWG/issues

  • David wants to close off the issue of multiple 'Data Controller'
    • Some regulations allow the possibility of having more than one Data Controller - so the CR v1.1 has to be able to support this
    • General consensus on the call
  • Discussion on #80
    • Leave it as it is for this version
    • Future implementations may wish to declare very specific 'types'ofconsentthatare specifically bound to other things
    • RG: does this section include 'soft consent'?
      • Discussion - perhaps the discussion is more about pseudonymity versus identified entities
      • This is a longer discussion about device fingerprints being usedasindentifyingdata
  • #106
    • AI: ACH - Need a blurb "about Kantara"
30 minDraft of publication synopsis for new WGAndrew

The purpose of the Consent Management Solutions – Best Current Practices publication is to establish an open standard of good practice for the management of an individual’s consent to process their personal data in electronic systems. The publication describes the practices used by leading organizations to manage the full lifecycle of an individual’s consent toprocess their personal data. 

Proposed Table of Contents

  • Introduction
  • Scope
  • Notations and Abbreviations
  • Terms and Definitions
  • Actors and Roles
  • Best Current Practices – Consent management solutions
    • General
    • Consent Management Life Cycle
    • Regulations
    • Privacy Notice
    • Collection of consent
    • Management of consent records
    • Interoperability of consent records
  • Use Cases
  • Considerations (Non-Normative)
  • Document Change History
  • Bibliography
  • Contributors

((Andrew is late finalizing the drafts for circulation))

Discussion

  • There is a new wiki page that will hold all the known implementations of Consent Receipts
    • Includes a space to describe how the implementation uses the Kantara CR spec
  • Discussion about Consent Management Solutions BCP TOC
    • Link the BCP into Data Governance and Data Management practices
      • This is a pre-requisite


  •   
  •   
  •   
  •