Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

2016-11-18

Meeting notes approved at 2017-01-05 Meeting Notes (CR)

Attendees

Voting

...

Info
titleVoting participants

Participant Roster (2016) - Quorum is 4 of 7 as of 2016-10-06

Iain Henderson, Mary Hodder, Harri Honko, Mark Lizar, Jim Pasquale, John Wunderlich, Andrew Hughes

Discussion Items

Not enough attendees - will revert to list for discussion

...

TimeItemWhoNotes
10 mins
  • Roll call
  • Agenda bashing
  • Meeting minutes approval
Andrew Hughes

 

25 min
  • Based on feedback from implementors, there are some issues that should be addressed for CR v1.0:
    v1
    • Conformance is missing ; Major schema change to add validation. (Samuli can explain)
    • ‘PII Principle ID” is used without reference or definition. I assume that this is the data subject (which seems like a more intuitive name). PII Principle. i.e., the individual's name is missing.
    • I think you’ll need an array of strings to name multiple third parties.
    • We need an array for multiple controllers in json – this is suggested in the spec but no array is available. 
    • Mark Added - "Public Key should be in Data Controller section"
    • Mark Added "Add Data Retention Field as suggested in v.0.9.3” 
    v1.x
    • Need an explanation of the relationship between the elements.
    • publicKey: currently string, should this be JWK object? 
    • collectionMethod: table says type is object, schema says type is string, I guess string is correct
    • Consent type - requests for both content and JSON structure
    • Purpose termination / data retention
David Turner 

 

CR Spec publication schedule

Current: call for comments on draft spec commences

...