Next will we will extend the meeting from 930-1230ET.
The group reviewed the 4 documents in the link above will be discussed.
- is there ordering between the relationships? (implicit or explicit)
- how can we better overlay identity with UMA. One of the biggest anecdotal gaps is how identity integrates to UMA
- eg RS may run their own identity process, or federate to another IDP - which could be the UMA AS??
- RO required IAL 2/3, easy to show with 1 IDP running the federation process. in practice there will be many more IDPs that need to collaborate