|45 min||Moving forward with the gap report||Jim/ all|
- Does it make sense and can we use the framing core issue topic from the Data Mobility report as the bases and outline for the consent gap analysis?
Incumbent Business Case: There is a lack of proof points for the innovation opportunity.
Infrastructure & Standards: The need for common technologies, standards, and services,
Individuals’Know How: Consumers have a lack of know-how and understanding of the digital market, and limited knowledge about their data, how it is used, and how they could use it.
Adaptive Regulation: Well-functioning markets require strong regulation and legislation.
Service applications: Lack of services and applications that enable Individuals to be empowered
- Lisa mentioned approaching all the topic using BLT (business, Legal, Technical requirements), James A. also agreed, along with Nancy. where both where All where clear, today's consent definition is lacking a lot of requirements to meet other laws like HIPAA. James is adamant around the idea of businesses resisting providing consent records to individuals and will continue on the current path. As it is not in their interest to empower consumers or customers with information continuing to coerce people on either side of the sell/buy/own relationships with wordy TCs, TOUs, and CRMs rigged on their behave.