Child pages
  • DRAFT 2018-05-02 Meeting notes

Versions Compared


  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.



Status of Minutes

titleRemove this box when creating meeting notes

Meeting minutes and notes are DRAFT until approved by the WG voting members. Use this section to link to the meeting minutes that recorded the approval motion.


Approved at: <<Insert link to minutes showing approval>> DRAFT 2018-06-13 Meeting notes


  1. Call to order
    1. Roll Call & Determination of quorum status
    2. Agenda bashing
    3. Kantara Organization updates 
  2. WG Motions
    1. Motion to approve << links to meeting notes needing approval >>
  3. Presentation/Demo 
    1. Mircea Patachi - UNLOQ
    2. Ken Klingenstein - Consent-Informed Attribute Release
  4. Discussion of initial Table of Contents - Corné
  5. Upcoming conferences and events
  6. All Other Business (AOB)
  7. Adjourn


Meeting was quorate

Voting participants

Participant roster (CMS) - Quorum is 4 of 6 as of 2018-04-02






5 min
  • Call to order
  • Roll call
  • Agenda bashing
  • Organization updates

5 minWG Motions
Quorum required 

Meeting was not quorate at the time of motion-making - deferred

Motion to approve DRAFT 2018-04-04 Meeting notes

Moved by:



5 min



Mircea Patachi - UNLOQ - working on consent / data privacy platform

Ken Klingenstein - Internet2 - open source consent management platform - developers from Duke University

  • Marlena Erdos - Lead Architect

Chris Olsen - Walt Disney - IAM Pro

15 min

Presentation/Demo - UNLOQ

Mircea Patachi

Clym - product

  • building a fit-for-purpose cookie consent tool
  • Target market - SME - a quick way to become minimally compliant for cookie management/consent
    • Feature: Consent transferability between partners
    • NOTE: this might be a good candidate to add to the myData interop demo
20 minPresentation/Demo - Consent-Informed Attribute ReleaseKen Klingenstein
  • Consent as a Service
  • Wants group to discuss 'special categories of data' - how to deal with this - e.g. obfuscation on UI
  • "Manage the cognitive load" - lots of UI research on this to make this manageable
    • Use of colors, language, etc
  • Demo uses the Duke IdP
  • Q: Is there a way to discover the "purpose for processing" on the policy management screen? A: working on adding Purposes now. IDP will need to record the basis for release, but not necessary to present to user all the time. A: The user does see a description - it's not named 'purpose'.
  • Trustmarks will be added into the UI - there are operational trustmarks now
  • Q: Does CAR adjust the attributes in the SAML assertion on the fly? A: yes - "Information Items" (scopes and claims) are adjusted (based on IDP and RP requirements) and shown to the user as appropriate
  • Note: much of this can be shown as Notification instead of Consent if consent is not the justification
  • Q: How are the API offerings? A: APIs are open for the Policy aspects - rich set available.
  • Q: Have you seen data retention and consent policies yet? A: Not yet - would be good to see new use cases.
5 minUpcoming conferences and eventsAndrew

Events that Kantara will have an active role:

5 minAOBChair
  • myData conference Helsinki - the proposal to the Interoperability track has been accepted - contact Jim at to get in on the demo


Next WG meeting Wednesday, May 16, 2018 10:00 Eastern Daylight Time / 15:00 BST