Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

2018-0607-2105

Status of Minutes

DRAFT

Approved at: <<Insert link to minutes showing approval>>

...

Time

Item

Who

Notes

4 mins
  • Roll call
  • Agenda bashing

5 min
  • Organization updates
All

Please review these blogs offline for current status on Kantara and all the DG/WG:

There is a new wiki page that will hold all the known implementations of Consent Receipts - Please update the page or inform Andrew of your implementation.

Planning a Member Plenary meeting October 26-ish San Francisco (Friday after IIW)

  • Are there specific cross-group items you'd like to propose to work on?
40 minInteroperable Consent Receipt demo at MyData ConferenceAndrew

AOB


Next meeting
2018-07-05 same time, same number

 

From 2018-06-28

  • Discussed Kartik's v1 of the sequence diagram
  • Park: the discussion about 'viewer/reader/dashboard' and the differences in functionality that those terms encompass
  • Has anyone played with the 'sand' demo app? URLs to follow by email
  • First part of the demo:
    • Data Subject interacts with Organization A and as a result, a consent receipt is created and shown to the Data Subject. The consent receipt is stored in a place that is known to the Data Subject.
  • Second part of the demo:
    • Data Subject starts their preferred app which they normally use to view and manage their consent receipts and sees a list of consent receipts that are in the place referenced from the first part of the demo. Data Subject clicks the new consent receipt and the contents are displayed.
  • ACTION: Mark/Sylvester to write functional descriptions of the 'viewer/reader/dashboard' concepts

...

From 2018-06-28 21 call:

  • John walked through the draft scenario
  • Mircea: why would the receiving org need to generate a new CR?
    • A: Depends on the interpretation of Article 20 implementation
  • Jim: digi.me's consent feature requires that the data processor notifies the user on downstream sharing
  • Karik: Trunomi allows counterparties to be defined and data sharing rules defined up front. PSD2 scenarios - has 2 consents that are tracked - 3rd party doing payments on behalf and the financial institution
  • ACH: Would it make sense to just do the simplest thing: one data controller mints a CR and a different org displays it.
  • Richard: important to do display and that the back end system is following the CR instructions
  • Jim: digi.me has started work to 'export' a CR artifact. The user might be notified of sharing event.
  • John: starting to think that we should disconnect the demo scenario from any specific regulatory requirement - this should stay a technical demo
  • Robert: agrees - show what you received is what was sent - and show multiple receipts that display in the same way
  • ACH: related that people in unconference sessions are capable of imagining potential uses of CRs - we need to show the simplest functions
  • Kartik: conceptually makes sense - questions on the details about how multiple platforms will play
  • Mircea - need to decide on which systems take on what roles in the demo - which ones create CR, which ones consume & display
  • Richard: in principle it is OK - what does it actually look like to a User - the UX and concept of a CR moving from one place to another - there is no metaphor for this yet
  • Oscar: does not have viewer yet - so this would help to have some else's viewer to use
  • Mark: is the CR moved directly by the back end or are the actions done by the User.
  • ACH: has lined up a mobile operator as a issuer of CRs - but they have no viewer - they need the user to use someone else's viewer
  • ACH: need to do a storyboard
  • Robert: the metaphor should probably be the same as physical receipt management - one place to view them
  • ACTION: Richard to sketch a story board for this
  • ACTION: Kartik to ask questions around how consent management platforms - send to email - includes sequence diagram
  • Mircea - is each consent receipt unique? and should it stay at the originator org? then the only thing transfered would be the CR id?
  • ACTION: Jim - to list some of the high level activities that digi.me is undertaking
  • Mark: OpenConsent is planning to have a Viewer by August
  • Possible distinction: A Viewer - look at CRs one at a time. Dashboard - look at multiple CRs and act on them.

...