Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Date

IPR

Thank you for joining the call today. 

This Work Group operates under the Non-Assertion Covenant IPR option found as an appendix to IPR Policies V2.0 that Kantara operates.The Group Participation Agreement memorializes your acknowledgment of the terms under which you participate in this Work Group. Every person who has acknowledged the GPA is listed in the Participant Roster, as a voting or non-voting participant.However, there are circumstances, such as in-person workshops or calls where non-participant guests may be present who have not acknowledged the GPA for this Work Group.

Every person on this call is strongly encouraged to acknowledge the GPA for this Work Group prior to any form of participation.
If you have not, or do not wish to, please Note Well the following before you participate in any form.

  1. In accordance with the Kantara Initiative IPR Policies V2.0, all contributions by voice are valid contributions alongside the much more preferred written contributions and while you still retain your IP, you grant Kantara copyright equivalent to the terms of the Non-Assertion Covenant without further condition or reservation.
  2. It is your own IP and not another party's IP
  3. Such contributions are not confidential or otherwise subject to the limitation in its distribution, including pricing or other competitively sensitive information.

Again, if you are uncertain about any matters, please remain silent and do not contribute anything in writing.

Attendees

Goals (revisit)

  • Call for Agenda Items
  • Use case Update 
  • Spec, update

Discussion items

Interesting discussion on use case today, continuing to highlight the gaps,  with different business, legal and technical perspective,

  • Review of the Use case
    • moved across the 3 different use cases 
      • brought up UMA and other other elements that are referred to use case 3
    • We jumped around a bit 
      • the aim of the call is to start with the first use case and walk step by step approach through the layers of complexity that were brought up on the call.
      • discussed a cookie use case  and legal requirements
    • The aim with the use cases is to address the gap
  • We had an update
    • with the first use case 
    • then moving to the second and third use case.


  • Actions: 
    • work on the spec contribution for next week
    • working more specification 
    • brief UMA - call on the work approach 

Brief UMA on relationship of work on call 22 April 2020.

Discussion of what is legal vs illegal and its impact on effort here and specification development.

James Hazard I think you should be agnostic as to the payloaad of a consent http://www.commonaccord.org/index.php?action=source&file=G/GA4GH/Demo/Geraldine_Graber_DE

AOB

Presentation at 

Action items

  •